DAFC.net
Home 07 December 2019 
 Post Message  |  Top of Board  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Twitter Updates  |  Log In   Forum Rules  |  Newer Topic  |  Older Topic  |  end 
[ please login to use the Like feature ]
 Finishers required
Topic Originator: WORST  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:04

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: Rigger Al  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:13

Quote:

WORST, Sat 10 Nov 17:04

What a game that was, very entertaining, but oh how need someone that can put the ball in the net.


Agree it was a good game but i couldnt see us scoring .
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: cjp1981  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:18

We have not recruited well at all to replace Clark and McManus. And it’s not due to lack of numbers, plenty of options but not a partnership between them. Mind you chopping and changing every week does nothing to help that or help our strikers confidence which is resulting in poor finishes. Every one of our strikers looks completely shot! No pun intended
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: JTH123  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:30

Quote:

Rigger Al, Sat 10 Nov 17:13

Quote:

WORST, Sat 10 Nov 17:04

What a game that was, very entertaining, but oh how need someone that can put the ball in the net.


Agree it was a good game but i couldnt see us scoring .


Before the subs I felt it was coming. Afterwards no chance.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: WORST  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:32

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: Berkey  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:36

I’ve given up on Ryan just not good enough.

Faz is a rocket, clearly not good enough and has decided he no longer needs to pass the ball or be a team player.

Muirhead has potential for me and fits better with our main tactic of long punts but can’t game match sharpe.

Keena, fast and caused problems, our chance of 3 points went off with him.

It’s ajs job to put the quality on the park to get the goals, time to realise these players are not underperforming, they are just not good enough.

Just sitting here drenched in my own negativity!
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: HalbeathRoad  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:38

AJ has replaced better players with utter dross. The fact he spent money on Andy Ryan is as bad as anything that happened pre -admin days.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: Rusty Shackleford  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:45

Quote:

HalbeathRoad, Sat 10 Nov 17:38

AJ has replaced better players with utter dross. The fact he spent money on Andy Ryan is as bad as anything that happened pre -admin days.


Except it's clearly not.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: DRFC_no1  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:50

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: Berkey  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:58

I wanted to give Ryan a chance to see if he was good enough and I’ve seen enough.

Not sure there was anyone on the park today you would be that bothered if they were on thier way at the end of the season. Struggling to see who has the quality required to take us further. Tactics to suit them would help I guess.

Aj has built a squad of average joes and they are performing at thier level.

Just sitting here drenched in my own negativity!
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: WORST  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 17:58

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: auldpar  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 18:01

Someone should maybe take FEB aside and explain the offside rule to him.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Finishers required
Topic Originator: GJS93  
Date:   Sat 10 Nov 18:02

was thinking exactly the same DRFC, can say the same with Morris/Ashcroft and captaincy.



Post Edited (Sat 10 Nov 18:15)
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Top of Board  |  Forum List  |  Threaded View   Forum Rules  |  Newer Topic  |  Older Topic  |  end 


 Forum List  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Security : type 'pars' in the box:
email: