|
|
Topic Originator: brian
Date: Sun 8 May 11:01
link to highlights
Highlights up now
John Hughes up now
Graham Dorrans at 11.30
from the ParsTV team.
____________________
contact: email me
File Share: https://share2.co.uk
ParsTV: https://ParsTV.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 8 May 11:36
Sending off - looked like a dive and there was sufficient cover to suggest it wasn`t an obvious GSO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wulliepar57
Date: Sun 8 May 11:40
I agree with you wee eck total dive , never a clear GSO either , shocking decision from the referee who allowed them all game to foul consistently and never booked any of them till the crowd reacted !
We also had a few good chances in the game that we should have done better with , you can see why we are where we are ! that team JH picked was never the best !!
Will say no more still hurting too much
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 8 May 11:46
We should appeal the red card if only to embarrass the ref but the beaks would probably back him!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Sun 8 May 11:56
No point appealing. He won`t play another game for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 8 May 12:02
Appeal it just to make the point. It was a huge decision in the context of that match. Ambrose will have to serve a suspension if he joins another Scottish club.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: GJS93
Date: Sun 8 May 12:05
Craig Napier strikes again...
it isnt a clear goal scoring opportunity but not a surprise he gave it.
that miss from O`Hara straight after they score too, again not a surprise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: 1985Par
Date: Sun 8 May 12:12
What has the modern day game become that the tackle from Ambrose warrants a red card?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Westies squint kicks
Date: Sun 8 May 12:41
Surprised to hear Hughes after the match interviewed acknowledging it was a red.
Highlights show the incident very well, thanks for your efforts with the highlights this season Brian
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sun 8 May 12:43
No surprise from efe, be suprised if he’s full time next season. Lunged in when he didn’t need to after as usual about 3 mistakes in possession from us let the boy get away.
Yeah very few excuses for that miss from o’hara at the end, he is being asked to work the whole front line on his own and bust a gut all game so can only think tiredness played a part.
Things will be looking up……..now yogi is gone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dafc-chris1
Date: Sun 8 May 13:16
He was through on goal covering defenders wouldn`t have got there in time so the red is the right decision
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 8 May 13:27
His touch took him away from goal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Ianoappar
Date: Sun 8 May 14:11
No way was that a red card looked to me that no contact was made.
Going by the highlights that`s one poor Queens team just shows how far we have fallen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sun 8 May 15:50
I thought it was red as soon as he lunged. He was through on the keeper and nobody near him. Was there contact though?
If only there was a system available to double check such important decisions!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Sun 8 May 17:04
Clear red card from where we sat, and from the footage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bandy
Date: Sun 8 May 17:30
It`s one of those where the striker has initiated the contact - you can seem him intentionally drag his right foot. Sometimes they`re given, sometimes they aren`t, but once the ref blew for a foul it was a red - certainly if the foul was at the other end, I`d have been screaming for a red.
But...I don`t think it`s a foul. I think strikers initiating contact and then being `entitled to go down` is a real blight on the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 8 May 18:34
`Clear red card from where we sat, and from the footage.`
In what way was it `clear` and how far away from the action were you? From my seat in the South stand I couldn`t tell if there was contact but I could see there was enough cover to prevent a clear goal-scoring opportunity. The footage suggests any contact was instigated by Murray surely. Even John Potter said he wasn`t sure there was contact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Sun 8 May 18:40
My Opinion .. No way was that a red .. The striker drags his legs to make contact
You can see why the ref gave it tho .. And even with the benefit of replay the decision is divided on here .. but the Ref only has real time
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 8 May 18:43
What about denying a goal-scoring opportunity though, Bpp? It`s got to meet both criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Mon 9 May 09:50
"In what way was it `clear` and how far away from the action were you? "
In the Norrie - just looked at the footage on YouTube - looked a no brainer to award - meets the criteria for DOGSO.
The referee was much closer than any of us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: AJ27
Date: Mon 9 May 09:54
If it had been at the other end we’d have been screaming for a red card.
Andy J
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Mon 9 May 10:10
There`s no defending that tackle. Definite foul & definite denying a goal scoring opportunity. What`s more annoying is Polworth (again) lost the ball in the middle of the park. Get him to fk away from my club. Waste of a jersey.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Mon 9 May 10:28
I actually thought Donaldson fouled the QP player before the pass that lead to the red card - but the referee let play continue, possibly applying the advantage rule......which he did several times throughout the game.
If only he had awarded the foul..........................
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parsfan97
Date: Mon 9 May 10:36
Agree with da no 1. Polworth gives the ball away and then they are straight in. The fact even Queen’s Park had a go and went 2 up front just shows how poor Hughes tactics are
|
|
|
|
|
|
