|
Topic Originator: Parsdaft
Date: Thu 8 Feb 16:08
Source X - PLZ SOCCER
Blue cards are set to be trialled in football from next season which will result in a player receiving a 10-minute sin-bin
It is believed that the blue card will be shown if a player commits a cynical foul or shows dissent towards a match official
Is this a positive move?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: MikeyLeonard
Date: Thu 8 Feb 16:10
FFS. . more unnecessary tinkering ?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 8 Feb 16:14
I can`t see Celtic accepting Blue Cards.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bucuresti Par
Date: Thu 8 Feb 16:19
Doubt they would be that keen on orange either, not that they are or their friends from across the city would get many anyway.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parathletic
Date: Thu 8 Feb 16:34
I believe they are also considering cooling off periods to allow referees to temporarily stop the game if arguments between players become heated.I heard them talking about it on Talksport earlier-total nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dover par
Date: Thu 8 Feb 16:55
Any player diving should be sent off too
"Pressure is something you feel when you don't know what the hell you're doing."
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: DunPar
Date: Thu 8 Feb 17:26
Why wouldn’t they be keen on orange ? The most commonly waved flag at Celtic games is made up of a third orange. Come to think of it……..Celtic fans wave more orange than any other supporters in Scotland…….orange bastards !
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: GG Riva
Date: Thu 8 Feb 17:44
Quote:
dover par, Thu 8 Feb 16:55
Any player diving should be sent off too
I can`t agree with that, dover. Not because I condone diving, but because I can envisage many players being sent off unjustly. Remember the vast majority of games don`t have VAR, so the ref may think a player has dived and send him off, when in fact there was contact or he simply lost his balance and wasn`t trying to con the ref. At present, a yellow card allows the player to stay on the park. Under your proposed, the ref would be obliged to send him off.
Not your average Sunday League player.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Rigger Al
Date: Thu 8 Feb 18:00
Don`t need anymore BS Added ,
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Luxembourg Par
Date: Thu 8 Feb 19:09
Quote:
Rigger Al, Thu 8 Feb 18:00
Don`t need anymore BS Added ,
Blue is just a ramped up yellow to give an out to referees bottling a red for a cynical foul…
I would like to see a few thing from rugby brought in
Sin-bin is a good one, a yellow card doesn’t help you, only benefiting one of your rivals a few games later when a ban kicks in.
I’d also favour the 10 yard advancement on free kicks for dissent, and maybe for not retreating.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: red-star-par
Date: Thu 8 Feb 19:49
They need to stop messing about with the game, it was almost perfect before, they are in danger of ruining it
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kelty_par
Date: Thu 8 Feb 20:12
Man City will be down to about 8 players if this comes in at the highest level. Rodri will be in and out the game constantly.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: steaua
Date: Thu 8 Feb 20:59
What a pile of p**. Football is already in a state without introducing blue cards. They are needing to get rid of some of the rockets running football. And I don`t mean the football managers.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Thu 8 Feb 21:11
Good idea and about time. Yellow cards are no deterrent. Blue cards will give a just advantage.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parathletic
Date: Thu 8 Feb 21:29
Sinbins would be an absolute farce and just provide even more problems for the officials.We just need the referees to use the powers that they already have correctly.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dd23
Date: Thu 8 Feb 22:10
If you think time wasting is bad now, wait till a team is winning and get a man sin binned.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Rigger Al
Date: Thu 8 Feb 22:49
Quote:
parathletic, Thu 8 Feb 21:29
Sinbins would be an absolute farce and just provide even more problems for the officials.We just need the referees to use the powers that they already have correctly.
Agree ,
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Fri 9 Feb 12:21
Need to get more a detailed explanation on how this would work in practice.
Presumably under these proposals a blue card would be a standalone punishment - so if followed by a yellow card would not automatically escalate to a red ?
Would two blue cards automatically escalate to a yellow, with a previous yellow resulting in a red ?
What if a blue card was awarded after a yellow ?
I used to be a volleyball referee - FIVB used a three card disciplinary system which escalated to more serious sanctions , the lowest was a recorded verbal warning, which sounds much like this blue card idea, though in general terms only.
Post Edited (Fri 09 Feb 12:22)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Jeffery
Date: Fri 9 Feb 14:47
I would have thought it would be the same as a yellow in card count but with the additional sin bin time.
So one blue card followed by a further yellow means you are off, and the same if it`s a yellow followed by something that would warrant a blue.
I note they`ve specifically called out professional fouls so it could discourage players `taking one for the team`.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: bigdonnie
Date: Fri 9 Feb 15:59
as mr spock in star trek would say its football jim but not as we know these idiots have ruined the game with v a r going to go on as long as cricket match way things are going glad dont have it in championship or other divisions
donald mcneil
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Jeffery
Date: Fri 9 Feb 17:10
Quote:
veteraneastender, Fri 9 Feb 15:05
Don`t see that being the scenario.
Would be just as well making all first yellow cards result in sin bin time.
Needs precise clarification.
This explains further - https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13066894/ifab-set-to-introduce-blue-cards-for-football-sin-bins
Over complicating it seems.
Obviously need to see what IFAB come out with but that article seems to say what I assumed about how it would be used.
Two blue cards would result in the player`s dismissal for the rest of the match, as would a blue and a yellow card.
I don`t think its use seems all that complicated but there will need to be a really clear definition of what is a blue vs a yellow. The lines there could be pretty blurry.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: AdamAntsParsStripe
Date: Fri 9 Feb 17:29
Back cards are preferred tonight.
Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Rigger Al
Date: Fri 9 Feb 21:59
Ffs,the card system we have is more than enough,We just need the officials to have the b___s to implement.
Also there needs a serious instruction to the prema Dona football Players to respect the rules .
If you disrespect the rules and jump in the face if the officials then you carry the risk of a red
Why I love watching rugby ,players respect the officials ,either right or wrong .
We have players in the top league in England earning 200,000 a WEEK thinking they are above the rules
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: doctordandruff
Date: Fri 9 Feb 23:44
VAR, handball, 5 subs, mega injury time. And now this crap. When was the last time there was a rule introduced to actually improve the game. The passback rule revolutionised the sport, and even the changes to offside have transformed it for the better. But everything else seems to risk ruining the game over an issue nobody is complaining about.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Sat 10 Feb 13:32
The more I think on this, the dafter the idea sounds.
A blue card would in effect be a yellow card with an additional secondary punishment - time off the park.
A player could get an "ordinary" yellow for clattering an opponent - wheras another could get blue for a more technical offence such as dissent.
Would a blue incur more disciplinary points than a yellow ?
Post Edited (Sat 10 Feb 13:33)
|
|
|
|
|