|
|
Topic Originator: Westies squint kicks
Date: Wed 25 Feb 18:48
The assault on Amade at 9m 55s is cowardly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: MinnesotaAndy
Date: Thu 26 Feb 13:53
IMO That assault on Amade worth a red.
Happy the highlights didn`t cover the Chilokoa-Mullen throw-in when he killed half a minute of game time deciding where to throw the ball. Either take the throw-in fast to a player who is free, or launch it as far as possible up the line. Or do we need rocket science?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Thu 26 Feb 13:54
Quote:
MinnesotaAndy, Thu 26 Feb 13:53
IMO That assault on Amade worth a red.
Happy the highlights didn`t cover the Chilokoa-Mullen throw-in when he killed half a minute of game time deciding where to throw the ball. Either take the throw-in fast to a player who is free, or launch it as far as possible up the line. Or do we need rocket science?
We are murder at throw ins. Have been for ages. I don`t see any other teams finding the same difficulty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Ahoy!Ahoy!
Date: Thu 26 Feb 14:06
There’s a real lack of movement at throw ins. Saying that even when we do find a a team mate they either knock it straight out the pitch or loft it forward and the defenders win the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: bannerpar
Date: Thu 26 Feb 15:17
Lack of movement at throw-ins has been a shortcoming for years now. They should try to dig out some footage of Hamish French darting around for space to give the thrower a target to let them see how it should be done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: buffy
Date: Thu 26 Feb 15:25
Can’t recall bad throw-ins when Edwards was taking them.
”Buffy’s Buns are the finest in Fife”, J. Spence 2019”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: shellypar
Date: Thu 26 Feb 17:03
Quote:
buffy, Thu 26 Feb 15:25
Can’t recall bad throw-ins when Edwards was taking them.
Aye cos he could throw it long, the issue is movement, aswell as the fact that specifically down the right, mullen doesnt seem to have the knack of thundering it down the line aswell, so if the players dont move, hes unable to take a quick one, what we need is our players running around, making the opposition not know who to mark, and creating the space for ourselves to get something out of it, a cross, shot, corner etc.
COYP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Sacktheref69
Date: Thu 26 Feb 17:10
We don`t need a quick throw. Movement and someone who doest take foul throws most of the time will help.
This is Andy Tod`s world and we are lucky to live in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: shellypar
Date: Thu 26 Feb 18:49
Quote:
Sacktheref69, Thu 26 Feb 17:10
We don`t need a quick throw. Movement and someone who doest take foul throws most of the time will help.
How do we not need a quick throw may i ask?
COYP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: saltonsgonagetu
Date: Thu 26 Feb 19:40
Quote:
shellypar, Thu 26 Feb 18:49
Quote:
Sacktheref69, Thu 26 Feb 17:10
We don`t need a quick throw. Movement and someone who doest take foul throws most of the time will help.
How do we not need a quick throw may i ask?
Id guess most times we have a throw it ends up either going backwards or a turnover to the opposition
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bandy
Date: Fri 27 Feb 09:58
Not a huge fan of the assault on Amade or the Thistle number 5 poking our keeper in the eyes.
isn`t contact with the eyes a straight red and a 12 week ban in rugby? Here it`s a simple freekick?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parsmad68
Date: Fri 27 Feb 10:03
The Amade one was common assault as I seen it from the NW. I saw it clearly from close range, but almost everyone was focussed on the forward play and didn’t see it when it happened. The referee and NW linesman can be forgiven for this but the stand side linesman must have had a clear view and I genuinely wonder what these guys watch when they are running the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Jeffery
Date: Fri 27 Feb 17:29
That`s disgraceful. Surely retrospective action can be taken?
|
|
|
|
|
|
