|
Topic Originator: Rastapari
Date: Wed 18 Dec 16:12
As it says...
If you voted for this you know what you are.
Not to worry though, all your billionaire friends will no doubt do very well and no doubt be bursting to pass on their good fortune to you.
Sigh.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: desparado
Date: Wed 18 Dec 17:28
Yip read this today.....a lot worse to come ........folk will soon realise what we as a country have voted for....it is not going to be nice.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Wotsit
Date: Wed 18 Dec 17:32
650k potential new customers for me.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dafc
Date: Wed 18 Dec 22:40
Didn't they also propose to remove the need to sell your home to pay for care as well? That's excellent and deserves a well done.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: donj
Date: Wed 18 Dec 23:06
Easy to say anything,lot harder to actually see it happening.Boris talks the talk unfortunately he does not walk the walk.
Would not trust him giving him cash to go to the shop let alone run a country.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Tenruh
Date: Thu 19 Dec 06:54
Quote:
dafc, Wed 18 Dec 22:40
Didn't they also propose to remove the need to sell your home to pay for care as well? That's excellent and deserves a well done.
Isn't that already the case in Scotland?
That's all very well if you have a home to sell.
Cannot wait till the 1st of February to see if the first Β£350 million extra each week gets paid into the NHS
Post Edited (Thu 19 Dec 07:09)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Mario
Date: Thu 19 Dec 10:02
There must be hundreds of thousands with homes that could sell thanks to the right to buy..
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 19 Dec 12:44
Think I read that most of the right to buy houses are now in the hands of private landlords. π²π²π²
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Mario
Date: Thu 19 Dec 14:17
Oh no they aint
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Rastapari
Date: Thu 19 Dec 15:08
Tory scum planning even more cuts to the vulnerable...
Day one.
I see only one of the scum has the testicular fortitude to defend them....oh and Mario.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 19 Dec 17:39
Now going to implement ID to vote!π‘π΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώπ΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώπ΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώ
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: donj
Date: Thu 19 Dec 20:34
LA how dare you try to teach Mario as he is here to teach us lol.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 19 Dec 21:20
Sorry!!ππ
πππ
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Mario
Date: Thu 19 Dec 22:01
Not defending anyone, merely pointing out that the right to buy becoming letting stats look like utter piffle to me.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: donj
Date: Thu 19 Dec 22:53
Pretty sure most did get sold for the profit,not lived in as this was the plan,and private landlords snapped them up as the sellers made a profit and they got a cheap house.
Brilliant idea not really.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: londonparsfan
Date: Fri 20 Dec 09:36
Fortunately the SNP had the foresight to end Right to Buy years ago.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: londonparsfan
Date: Fri 20 Dec 09:38
And even if 40% doesn't = "most of the homes" it's still a significant proportion of them and in conjunction with the drop off in house building has created a real issue for people.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Fri 20 Dec 12:00
In areas like Stenhouse in Edinburgh there are loads of ex-Council homes owned by landlords. One of the landlords run the local shop so rent on paid in there. An ex colleague had one and said it was an absolute state. Had to wait months for a shower to be fixed. When the guy finally came he said ALL the properties were in a similar state. She eventually moved out. Place was filled with damp and mould.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 20 Dec 12:56
They are all too busy watching "Homes under the hammer "ππππ²π²π²
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Wotsit
Date: Fri 20 Dec 13:34
The situation with temporary homeless acomodation is just as bad.
All the B&Bs in edinburgh are owned by one guy who charges the council an astronomical amount of money for sub standard accommodation.
That's money coming out of everyone's pocket to make this dude a multimillionaire for provide something that nobody really wants and that isn't fit for purpose.
The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: sadindiefreak
Date: Fri 20 Dec 20:59
I recall the son of Thatcher's housing minister Ian Gow became a multi millionaire of the back of renting out ex council houses.
I think he had more than 40 of them if I remember correctly.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Fri 20 Dec 21:27
I assume he bought those houses?
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: sadindiefreak
Date: Fri 20 Dec 22:19
Quote:
The One Who Knocks, Fri 20 Dec 21:27
I assume he bought those houses?
Of course he did.
Doesn't make it right though.
Social housing should never have been sold at a fraction of its value.
Many houses that were sold were then sold cheaply as the occupants lost their jobs as unemployment reached over 30% in some areas and they couldn't pay their mortgages.
When this happened they should have been bought back by the councils.
|
|
|
|
|