|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Wed 19 Feb 12:48
Neil Gray Health Sec visiting QM Hospital today.
Of course he will have nothing to say on the suspension of a biological female nurse with 30 service who complained about a biological male doctor in female attire invading a female changing area…
Now some utterly dim Labour MSP’s are saying they would never have voted for self ID if they thought this kind of situation might arise. Loads of women did, why were they ignored? Because Sturgeon branded them bigots?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dandy Warhol
Date: Wed 19 Feb 15:14
The SNP certainly pandered to this utter insanity.
I don`t wanna go down like disco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par
Date: Thu 20 Feb 00:37
We are an utter laughing stock.
We have the Labour party attempting a back-track, saying they never thought this would happen even though opponents of the bill said this is pretty much what would happen.
The same energy that allowed tens of thousands of kids to be gang raped due to "ohh I wont say anything because I don`t want to be called racist/sexist/LGBTQZphobic" is at play here.
The same fear of people not agreeing with them is the same fear that attempts to control what about and where a person engages in silent prayer.
The slippery slope.
Every tale has already been told and this one is "The Emperor`s new clothes" and a perfect example of how curtailment freedom of speech and expression is the tool of authoritarian who fear the common sense of the populous over the abstract, impractical nonsense of the academia set.
Homo erectus had a better grasp of human anatomy than NHS Fife.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: red-star-par
Date: Thu 20 Feb 08:15
For once I agree with Bletchley Par here. The whole thing is a total nonsense. People I speak to see that but are too scared to speak out as the trans lobby have become so aggressive. Emperors New Clothes is definitely the situation here.
It`s a mental health issue that needs treatment rather than people facilitating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 20 Feb 14:28
Strange that the same rules apply across the UK, something to do with the Equalities Act 2010?
Post Edited (Thu 20 Feb 14:33)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par
Date: Thu 20 Feb 14:56
Quote:
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 20 Feb 14:28
Strange that the same rules apply across the UK, something to do with the Equalities Act 2010?
Yes and it was that act that allowed the UK Government (tories) to refuse to send the bill for royal accent, thankfully.
Although as we can see many organisations have decided to pretty much enact it in practice.
I think this is the danger of not having a second chamber that it required another parliament to act as the revising house to say "Na, ye need to look at this again.".
Select committees are no substitute for a senate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
