|
|
Topic Originator: Kba990309
Date: Sat 5 Apr 15:39
Keith bray scores 2 for ICT today
Keith allan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kozmasrightfoot
Date: Sat 5 Apr 15:43
Shrewd signing?
Pars fan.
Magpies fan.
Mens tennis fan.
Alternative rock fan.
Not a fan of much else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: d3monstrate
Date: Sat 5 Apr 16:31
Hat-trick now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kozmasrightfoot
Date: Sat 5 Apr 16:34
Perhaps we shouldn`t have loaned him back.
Pars fan.
Magpies fan.
Mens tennis fan.
Alternative rock fan.
Not a fan of much else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wulliepar57
Date: Sat 5 Apr 16:36
The way things are going he will be an Asset in the first division for us , because at present it`s looking that`s the way we are heading
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sat 5 Apr 16:43
Quote:
wulliepar57, Sat 5 Apr 16:36
The way things are going he will be an Asset in the first division for us , because at present it`s looking that`s the way we are heading
At least he can shoot.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Ahoy!Ahoy!
Date: Sat 5 Apr 18:29
There’s something to look forward to next season. By all accounts he looks like he’ll be a right asset and will probably walk into the team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sat 5 Apr 18:40
We should have kept him.
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Ahoy!Ahoy!
Date: Sat 5 Apr 18:45
Bray on the right or Yeboah…..mmmm tough choice.
100 percent we should’ve kept him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: simo
Date: Sat 5 Apr 18:47
All very well saying we should have kept him but ICT only agreed to sell him if they got him back on loan.
Hamish French.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: AdamAntsParsStripe
Date: Sat 5 Apr 19:14
Quote:
simo, Sat 5 Apr 18:47
All very well saying we should have kept him but ICT only agreed to sell him if they got him back on loan.
Exactly that. Some of the people commenting need to think before posting.
Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Ahoy!Ahoy!
Date: Sat 5 Apr 19:16
They would have sold him regardless given there situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: JimDAFC
Date: Sat 5 Apr 19:35
Did Sutherland no score a hatrick for Cowdenbeath last week also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: par_33
Date: Sat 5 Apr 19:57
Well Yeobah won’t be here next season. So it’s a no brainer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: neils
Date: Sat 5 Apr 20:08
Inverness are in administration, it`s fantasy to believe they were/are in any position to drive any sort of bargain or insist on much.
the people in charge of Inverness are BDO , they are in administration! And would be struck off if they turned down fresh cash, please don`t forget ICT not only have zero cash, they owe a huge amount unpaid, which is the administrator job to clear, otherwise they will be liquidated.
Possibly it was goodwill to loan him back, probably pragmatism from us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: fcda
Date: Sun 6 Apr 12:01
Quote:
neils, Sat 5 Apr 20:08
Inverness are in administration, it`s fantasy to believe they were/are in any position to drive any sort of bargain or insist on much.
the people in charge of Inverness are BDO , they are in administration! And would be struck off if they turned down fresh cash, please don`t forget ICT not only have zero cash, they owe a huge amount unpaid, which is the administrator job to clear, otherwise they will be liquidated.
Possibly it was goodwill to loan him back, probably pragmatism from us.
Maybe Inverness wanted more for him without the loan arrangement, or maybe they thought they could get more value from him playing and then being sold at the end of the season? It would also be bad practice for BDO to just accept the first offer for an asset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
