DAFC.net
Home 25 May 2025 
 Post Message  |  Top of Board  |  Search  |  Log In   Forum Rules  |  Newer Topic  |  Older Topic  |  end 
[ please login to use the Like feature ]
 Starmer
Topic Originator: desparado  
Date:   Sun 20 Apr 23:55

Well it’s all out now. How long has he got?

What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 00:28

Care to elaborate?

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 10:00

Whats out? 🤔
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: desparado  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 10:11

Lord Alli and Starmer are or were in a relationship. Rumored months ago and story was going to break but he brought out a super injunction to muzzle the press. It’s on Twitter x.
Lord Alli contributed millions to the Labour Party whilst having an affair with Starmer. He is without doubt compromised.
All of the above are allegations but this story has been doing the rounds for a wee while now.

What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: P  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 10:15

Source Jim Davidson (yes the old comedian) - sounds legit 😆
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: desparado  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 10:36

My gut feeling ? It’s ligit alright. It will all unravel sooner rather than later.

What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dandy Warhol  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 12:19

It all comes out the closet sooner or later.

I don`t wanna go down like disco.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Parboiled  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 13:07

…..when did you?

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
-
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dandy Warhol  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 13:21

Quote:

Parboiled, Mon 21 Apr 13:07

…..when did you?


Pi5h patter.

I don`t wanna go down like disco.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 13:41

Quote:

desparado, Mon 21 Apr 10:11

Lord Alli and Starmer are or were in a relationship. Rumored months ago and story was going to break but he brought out a super injunction to muzzle the press. It’s on Twitter x.
Lord Alli contributed millions to the Labour Party whilst having an affair with Starmer. He is without doubt compromised.
All of the above are allegations but this story has been doing the rounds for a wee while now.


Sourcing X isn’t exactly giving you the right back up 😂
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Parboiled  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 15:05

He once said 99% of women don’t have a penis. He’s a pr*k

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Parboiled  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 15:12

And Swinney can’t define what a woman is…or is just too terrified to do so.



Post Edited (Mon 21 Apr 15:13)
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: desparado  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 17:13

Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Mon 21 Apr 15:12

And Swinney can’t define what a woman is…or is just too terrified to do so.


Deflection. The topic is about the rumours surrounding Starmer……it’s more than rumours and he won’t be able to keep a lid on it for too long.

Mind you it’s par for the course for Unionists as I have lost count in recent months how many have been caught out for being involved in criminality, corruption, being sex pests, sexual abusers and nonces. Red Tories and Blue Tories are rife with them. Must be something to do with their public school system where being abused is regarded as normal.

You are obviously annoyed with yourself for voting for Starmers mob, boy what a mug eh ?

What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 17:56

Absolute drivel thread.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: ipswichpar  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 18:00

Probably the most appropriate username in the world.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 18:10

Quote:

jake89, Mon 21 Apr 17:56

Absolute drivel thread.


Only thing I can find is a AI likely youtube video claiming theres some CCTV footage about it. Nothing from Jim Davidson the reported source of it all. 100% drivel that desperado has fallen for.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: P  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 20:11

Grok ;

As of April 20, 2025, the claims regarding alleged CCTV footage showing UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Lord Alli in compromising positions remain unverified rumors, primarily circulating on social media platforms like X. These allegations, which include claims of a physical interaction and Starmer’s wife reacting by contacting divorce lawyers, lack substantiation from credible, mainstream sources. No official statements from Keir Starmer, Lord Alli, or Labour Party headquarters confirm the existence of such footage or any related scandal. Reports from reputable outlets, such as the BBC and The Independent, focus instead on prior controversies involving Lord Alli’s donations to Starmer, including clothing and accommodation, but none corroborate the CCTV claims.

The rumors appear to have been amplified by posts on X, with some users citing comedian Jim Davidson as a source for the allegations. However, these posts do not provide verifiable evidence, and the rapid spread of the story on social media suggests a mix of speculation and unconfirmed gossip. Political scandals can be fueled by misinformation, and without concrete evidence—such as the alleged footage being released or acknowledged by authoritative sources—these claims should be treated with skepticism.

Labour HQ’s alleged “chaos” to bury the story is similarly unconfirmed, with no primary source validating internal party turmoil over this specific issue. Past controversies, like the 2024 “wardrobegate” involving Lord Alli’s donations, have drawn scrutiny to Starmer’s leadership, but they are unrelated to the current rumors. Starmer’s team has previously emphasized compliance with parliamentary rules on donations, and no evidence suggests a cover-up of the kind described.

Given the absence of verified information, the establishment narrative—lacking any official acknowledgment of the footage—cannot be accepted at face value, but neither can the rumors be confirmed. The situation underscores the need for caution in evaluating unverified claims, especially those driven by social media dynamics. If evidence emerges, it could significantly impact Starmer’s political standing, but as of now, the story remains speculative
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: desparado  
Date:   Mon 21 Apr 23:31

Time will tell……..

What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Tue 22 Apr 17:24

The alleged video viewing linked to Jim Davidson is fake news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-SDA5H_YsI


Post Edited (Tue 22 Apr 17:25)
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Tue 22 Apr 19:08

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 17:24

The alleged video viewing linked to Jim Davidson is fake news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-SDA5H_YsI


As if anyone is surprised. Davidson pedals any old ***** to remain relevant and making money. He`s done in terms of his TV career (too old, too out of date) so now he latches on to any old cack.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Tue 22 Apr 21:09

Quote:

Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Tue 22 Apr 19:08

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 17:24

The alleged video viewing linked to Jim Davidson is fake news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-SDA5H_YsI


As if anyone is surprised. Davidson pedals any old ***** to remain relevant and making money. He`s done in terms of his TV career (too old, too out of date) so now he latches on to any old cack.


If you had watched the video, which you certainly didn`t, instead of launching into an ad-hominem attack, you wouldn`t have made a fool of yourself with the above post.

So why don`t you watch it, then come back and gaslight us that the above post makes sense.

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: red-star-par  
Date:   Tue 22 Apr 22:41

I quite liked Jim Davidson in Big Break. There`s probably no market on telly for jokes about his mate Chalky these days I guess
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: OzPar  
Date:   Tue 22 Apr 23:27

Thanks for posting the link, BP.

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Wed 23 Apr 08:05

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 21:09

Quote:

Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Tue 22 Apr 19:08

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 17:24

The alleged video viewing linked to Jim Davidson is fake news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-SDA5H_YsI


As if anyone is surprised. Davidson pedals any old ***** to remain relevant and making money. He`s done in terms of his TV career (too old, too out of date) so now he latches on to any old cack.


If you had watched the video, which you certainly didn`t, instead of launching into an ad-hominem attack, you wouldn`t have made a fool of yourself with the above post.

So why don`t you watch it, then come back and gaslight us that the above post makes sense.


I don`t need to hear what Jim Davidson says. Going by your response, I`m guessing he denied any knowledge of the claim or links to it? Regardless, he is a flower of a man and deserves no attention.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Wed 23 Apr 08:59

Quote:

jake89, Wed 23 Apr 08:05

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 21:09

Quote:

Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Tue 22 Apr 19:08

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 17:24

The alleged video viewing linked to Jim Davidson is fake news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-SDA5H_YsI


As if anyone is surprised. Davidson pedals any old ***** to remain relevant and making money. He`s done in terms of his TV career (too old, too out of date) so now he latches on to any old cack.


If you had watched the video, which you certainly didn`t, instead of launching into an ad-hominem attack, you wouldn`t have made a fool of yourself with the above post.

So why don`t you watch it, then come back and gaslight us that the above post makes sense.


I don`t need to hear what Jim Davidson says. Going by your response, I`m guessing he denied any knowledge of the claim or links to it? Regardless, he is a flower of a man and deserves no attention.


I watched about 15 seconds of it, and it was exactly that. “Ive never heard of the footage. Or seen any footage regarding this”

Could just be an ultimate AI piece of work that people have fallen for, which just shows the true dangers of social media and AI these days. People will believe anything they see on the internet and all sorts of conspiracy theories run riot these days.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: desparado  
Date:   Sat 17 May 22:37

So a Ukrainian rent boy has been charged with Arson attacks on two of Starmers properties and a third mystery property too. Rumour has it that the third property is owned by Lord Ali.

What possible connection could their be between Starmer, a Stonewall validated multimillionaire and a Ukrainian rent boy ?

Our PM has been compromised and should resign.

It will all come out sooner rather than later.

Apparently a newspaper has voice recordings of this Ukrainian man that will seal Starmers fate. Will they release them ?

What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks  
Date:   Sun 18 May 14:41

Good grief Despy give the gay angle a rest. And what exactly is a Stonewall validated millionaire exactly? Are these recordings anything like that supposed video you were peddling the existence of just a couple of weeks back?

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Andrew283  
Date:   Sun 18 May 15:43

Rent boy? What a fecking Tw*t you are.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: ipswichpar  
Date:   Sun 18 May 16:48

desparado, does the use of the word "rumour" suggest that you think the rest of the post is factually accurate?!?
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Aaron Labonte  
Date:   Sun 18 May 18:57

Quote:

Andrew283, Sun 18 May 15:43

Rent boy? What a fecking Tw*t you are.


Such aggression in every single post you make . I bet you’re quiet in real life and weigh 7 stone soaking wet
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Sun 18 May 19:50

It is quite puzzling how this individual knew where these properties and the car were.

There was a lot of noise, sympathy from fellow uniparty leaders and Starmer claimed it was "an attack on democracy".

Then, once the individual had been caught, silence.

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Sun 18 May 20:05

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Sun 18 May 19:50

It is quite puzzling how this individual knew where these properties and the car were.

There was a lot of noise, sympathy from fellow uniparty leaders and Starmer claimed it was "an attack on democracy".

Then, once the individual had been caught, silence.


Im sure people can find these things if they try hard enough. I mean, it’s been common knowledge for decades where Gordon Browns house is…….

Im just shocked we didn’t get another AI infused youtube video telling us all this stuff 😃
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Sun 18 May 20:22

Quote:

Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Sun 18 May 20:05

Im sure people can find these things if they try hard enough. I mean, it’s been common knowledge for decades where Gordon Browns house is…….


Gordon`s Browns house was his constituency address, all MPs constituency homes are in the public domain as are all the candidates at election, they must have a residence in the constituency to stand.

These were private addresses and a car which he owned a year ago.

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks  
Date:   Sun 18 May 22:09

One was his family home, which due to the fact he now resides in Downing Street , he lets out to this sister in law. The other residence that suffered an arson attempt was at a block of flats that Starmer is believed to have lived at during the 1990s. That would have been before this 21 year old was born though the 26 year old who was detained at Luton Airport yesterday could possibly have been toddling around when the PM was still there.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: OzPar  
Date:   Mon 19 May 02:52

George Galloway`s take on this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx3DO4KYheU

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Mon 19 May 07:53

Quote:

OzPar, Mon 19 May 02:52

George Galloway`s take on this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx3DO4KYheU


Gave up after 4 and a half minutes. Sounds like drunk ramblings and video quality awful, looks like its been cut together piece by piece.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks  
Date:   Tue 20 May 09:20

A third man, aged 34, was arrested yesterday. This after a 21 year old Ukrainian and 26 year old Romanian were charged with arson.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: red-star-par  
Date:   Tue 20 May 18:04

Quote:

desparado, Sat 17 May 22:37

So a Ukrainian rent boy has been charged with Arson attacks on two of Starmers properties and a third mystery property too. Rumour has it that the third property is owned by Lord Ali.

What possible connection could their be between Starmer, a Stonewall validated multimillionaire and a Ukrainian rent boy ?

Our PM has been compromised and should resign.

It will all come out sooner rather than later.

Apparently a newspaper has voice recordings of this Ukrainian man that will seal Starmers fate. Will they release them ?


No idea if the arsonist is a "rent boy" but the picture they are using of him in the media certainly makes him look like he would like to be on the cover of Attitude
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Wed 21 May 14:19

What`s Attitude? Internet blog for kids?
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dandy Warhol  
Date:   Wed 21 May 15:23

Quote:

Andrew283, Sun 18 May 15:43

Rent boy? What a fecking Tw*t you are.


Have you even met the Internet?

I don`t wanna go down like disco.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: sadindiefreak  
Date:   Wed 21 May 23:51

Quote:

jake89, Wed 21 May 14:19

What`s Attitude? Internet blog for kids?


Gay lifestyle magazine.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Tenruh  
Date:   Thu 22 May 06:09

Quote:

sadindiefreak, Wed 21 May 23:51

Quote:

jake89, Wed 21 May 14:19

What`s Attitude? Internet blog for kids?


Gay lifestyle magazine.


Here`s me thinking there was only one gay rag.
https://youtu.be/M6U35hmvdcQ?si=S1Cy9NTXOwIwuzdr

Post Edited (Thu 22 May 06:09)
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Thu 22 May 18:03

Quote:

sadindiefreak, Wed 21 May 23:51

Quote:

jake89, Wed 21 May 14:19

What`s Attitude? Internet blog for kids?


Gay lifestyle magazine.


Cool. So the perpetrator "looks gay". Struggling for the relevance? Are gay men more likely to be arsonists? Is Kier Starmer fetishised in the gay community? Has Kier Starmer offended gay men? What`s the link?
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: P  
Date:   Thu 22 May 19:06

Quote:

jake89, Thu 22 May 18:03

Quote:

sadindiefreak, Wed 21 May 23:51

Quote:

jake89, Wed 21 May 14:19

What`s Attitude? Internet blog for kids?


Gay lifestyle magazine.


Cool. So the perpetrator "looks gay". Struggling for the relevance? Are gay men more likely to be arsonists? Is Kier Starmer fetishised in the gay community? Has Kier Starmer offended gay men? What`s the link?


It’s the latest conspiracy fed by the right wing that Starmer uses rent boys. Usually accompanied by a claim that the Sun have recordings or that Ukrainians have somehow been using rent boys to blackmail Starmer to keep funding them.

Has about as much credibility at the AI nonsense that folk on here latched onto or the bag of crisps actually being lines of coke.

I do find it quite interesting though that the volume of social media manipulation ramped up exponentially since Labour got into power and this was less common when the similarly disliked tories were in power.

Leads to the question - are right wing leaning individuals more gullible and keen to buy into nonsense or is the dissemination and creation of these yarns funded & run by the tories. Probably a bit of both.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Thu 22 May 20:00

The latest saga has come from Reform with a tweet regarding Anas Sarwar, which is blatant racism. They have refused to remove it and believe it to be true. Thing is the knuckle draggers will latch on to it and believe it.

And don’t even get started on Kemi - shes horrendously bad 😂
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Thu 22 May 20:07

Sounds light a daft lads fantasy. It`s 2025, not 1925. No-one cares if someone`s gay, straight, bi or a bloody giraffe.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dandy Warhol  
Date:   Fri 23 May 12:31

Politicians and rent boys, so 80`s.

I don`t wanna go down like disco.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Fri 23 May 17:26

Labour now polling 3rd in Scotland.



https://www.survation.com/new-survation-polling-shows-the-effect-of-reforms-disruptive-rise-in-scotland/



Post Edited (Fri 23 May 17:27)
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Fri 23 May 17:45

Reform will never win in Scotland, so just how the SNP are so far ahead is staggering considering recent “scandals”. Thought Labour would be a stick on for next year’s election, maybe SNP will manage to just about hold on.

Any other party would be a disaster for us though - could see the rollback of bridge tolls, prescriptions, tuition fees etc if right parties get in.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Fri 23 May 17:51

Quote:

Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Fri 23 May 17:45

Reform will never win in Scotland


Win?

3 short weeks ago you were scoffing at the prospect of them coming third.



[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Fri 23 May 18:01

He`s consistently said they won`t win.

Will you be voting Reform, Bletchley?
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Fri 23 May 18:12

Quote:

Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Fri 23 May 18:01

He`s consistently said they won`t win.


Except 3 weeks ago then, when he stated "not a chance Reform will become 3rd biggest in Scotland."

Hardly stunning and brave to predict they won`t win.

[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Dave_1885  
Date:   Fri 23 May 18:26

Quote:

Bletchley_Par, Fri 23 May 18:12

Quote:

Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Fri 23 May 18:01

He`s consistently said they won`t win.


Except 3 weeks ago then, when he stated "not a chance Reform will become 3rd biggest in Scotland."

Hardly stunning and brave to predict they won`t win.


One poll doesn’t make them the 3rd biggest in Scotland 🤦🏻‍♂️😂
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Bletchley_Par  
Date:   Fri 23 May 18:36

Quote:

Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Fri 23 May 18:26


One poll doesn’t make them the 3rd biggest in Scotland 🤦🏻‍♂️😂


Yes, neither does the previous 6 polls mean that either.





Post Edited (Fri 23 May 18:58)
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: jake89  
Date:   Fri 23 May 19:20

Voting Reform then Bletchley?
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: AdamAntsParsStripe  
Date:   Fri 23 May 19:33

The thing with most unionists is they don’t have loyalty to a party but will vote for the most popular one that opposes independence at the time.
Just voters constantly switching their X’s

Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Re: Starmer
Topic Originator: Wotsit  
Date:   Sat 24 May 07:51

Seems to fit with the far right continuing its recent trend of rallying the votes of unpopular neo liberal governments and handing them unlikely election wins.

The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.
[IP address logged]
Report Abuse   Reply To This Message
 Top of Board  |  Forum List  |  Threaded View   Forum Rules  |  Newer Topic  |  Older Topic  |  end 


Rows: 1
 Forum List  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Security : type 'pars' in the box:
email:
© 2021-- DAFC.net