|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Fri 15 Jun 08:30
Does it have provision for upkilting too or do men not matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Mario
Date: Fri 15 Jun 08:58
Are you a Commando, or just a woolly undercracker wimp?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: MDCCCLXXXV
Date: Fri 15 Jun 09:59
How can that law JUST have been passed
 East End Park is a symbol of all that is DAFC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Fri 15 Jun 11:47
Guardrooms in Highland regiments had a mirror on the floor and Jocks in kilts would have an undercarriage check before going on duties or out in public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Fri 15 Jun 13:32
Quote:
MDCCCLXXXV, Fri 15 Jun 09:59
How can that law JUST have been passed
It has always been illegal. Just under a different charge. They are just upgrading amd hoghlighting it as a specific crime rather than filed under indecemcy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Fri 15 Jun 15:31
thoat this was a thread about unscrupulous joiners trying to sell additional wood facia for on top of your flooring
imagine my disappointment.......
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Fri 15 Jun 15:36
"They are just upgrading amd hoghlighting it as a specific crime rather than filed under indecemcy"
Barbecued pork ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Fri 15 Jun 16:23
Quote:
widtink, Fri 15 Jun 15:55
New upskirting law blocked by Tory MP -http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-44496427
England really needs to drag itself into the 21st century. Disgraceful performance from a Tory again. Thank goodness Scotland did the right thing back in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: onlytakes
Date: Fri 15 Jun 17:03
In fairness, he's objected as it wasn't debated. Whilst it sounds straightforward - don't take photos up a skirt or you're getting a slap - is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Fri 15 Jun 18:56
Quote:
onlytakes, Fri 15 Jun 17:03
In fairness, he's objected as it wasn't debated. Whilst it sounds straightforward - don't take photos up a skirt or you're getting a slap - is it?
He objected because that's what he does. What debate does it need?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: onlytakes
Date: Fri 15 Jun 19:32
Quote:
moviescot, Fri 15 Jun 18:56
Quote:
onlytakes, Fri 15 Jun 17:03
In fairness, he's objected as it wasn't debated. Whilst it sounds straightforward - don't take photos up a skirt or you're getting a slap - is it?
He objected because that's what he does. What debate does it need?
I assume it's because it's not as simple as "Don't do it". No doubt you have to define skirts and other such things that seem pointless but matter. Already seen on this thread people asking about kilts, for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Fri 15 Jun 20:11
Quote:
onlytakes, Fri 15 Jun 19:32
Quote:
moviescot, Fri 15 Jun 18:56
Quote:
onlytakes, Fri 15 Jun 17:03
In fairness, he's objected as it wasn't debated. Whilst it sounds straightforward - don't take photos up a skirt or you're getting a slap - is it?
He objected because that's what he does. What debate does it need?
I assume it's because it's not as simple as "Don't do it". No doubt you have to define skirts and other such things that seem pointless but matter. Already seen on this thread people asking about kilts, for example.
Rubbish. The minutae would be done in committee. He has form objecting to private member bills. He's a knob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: onlytakes
Date: Fri 15 Jun 20:27
Just giving him the benefit of the doubt. May be he's just one of those people...a Tory 😉
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: red-star-par
Date: Fri 15 Jun 20:33
Quote:
onlytakes, Fri 15 Jun 20:27
Just giving him the benefit of the doubt. May be he's just one of those people...a Tory 😉
If he is a Tory, he is probably just worried it may prevent fellow Tories from upskirting underage girls
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bandy
Date: Fri 15 Jun 21:58
He has form for this kind of thing, he's done it since he was first elected in 1983. His constituents must not mind too much, because they keep voting for him.
In fact I think he objects to the majority of Private Bills, as he objects to the principle of rushing new legislation through on a Friday afternoon when there aren't many MPs in the house, and without a proper debate. He'd have objected to any bill being rushed through in this way, as is his right.
He will have known well in advance that he'd would take an absolute kicking in the media for objecting to this bill (no doubt it'll be portrayed that he's somehow supportive of upskirting), and, I must say, I have some respect for him for sticking to his guns when he must've known what will be coming in his direction. Not every MP has the guts to do that.
For what it's worth, I supported the bill going through, just in case anyone thinks I'm supportive of upskirting for defending Christopher Chope's right to object.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: DBA
Date: Fri 15 Jun 22:15
The main problem I have with the objection is that he doesn't have to give any sort of reasoning or rationale for it.
Surely any objection should have to have some level of merit or opinion from the objector? He seems to be a serial objector because he doesn't like the idea of private members bills. That's it.
As far as I can tell, he's able to just object with no reasoning and that's enough to park the bill and put it to the back of the queue.
UK democracy eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bandy
Date: Fri 15 Jun 22:30
That’s my point - he’s been doing this for decades. His constituents keep voting him in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: MDCCCLXXXV
Date: Sat 16 Jun 00:06
I prefer Ballingry law, If I seen a guy taking a pic up a girls skirt, he wouldn't be able to look at the pictures for weeks , until the swelling around his face allowed him to open his eyes.... even then he would have to get someone to operate his phone until his hands healed.
Maybe not PC but it is effective .
East End Park is a symbol of all that is DAFC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sat 16 Jun 00:08
What went wrong with the world that this is even a thing?
Christ on a bike
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sat 16 Jun 08:21
He’s certainly helped the public forget about about another disastrous week for the tories on brexit.
Quite handy that...
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Sat 16 Jun 08:41
Quote:
da_no_1, Sat 16 Jun 00:08
What went wrong with the world that this is even a thing?
Christ on a bike
Wasn't this made a thing when the paps started catching celebs getting out of cars etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: onlytakes
Date: Sat 16 Jun 13:00
Just noticed he's 71 too. Whether right or wrong, surely he should retire and let someone else have a go? Can't imagine he's staying on because he has to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: eagle_glen
Date: Sat 16 Jun 17:44
I believe that upkilting may still be legal ……. jus' sayin !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Never10yairds
Date: Sun 17 Jun 16:48
It’s a creepy thing to do. No one should anyway regardless of the law
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Mario
Date: Wed 20 Jun 10:34
<https://web.mailsubscriptions.co.uk/webreplica/content?productName=Daily+
Mail&startDate=2018-06-19&id=1107113&pageNum=19&storyNum=38#38>
"Well, is he or isn't he?"
Post Edited (Wed 20 Jun 10:44)
|
|
|
|
|
|
