|
|
Topic Originator: fcda
Date: Sun 19 Apr 18:43
Don`t like it. You`ll still get very marginal decisions, just from the other side of the forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: 1985Par
Date: Sun 19 Apr 19:51
I like the idea of this. It frustrates me when good goals are chalked off for an attacker being a bawhair goal side of the last defender. If it’s a body and a bawhair- fair enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Milos Drizzle
Date: Sun 19 Apr 20:11
Always said, as said above, all this does is shift the “baw hair” decisions back to the other side of the body. Does give the attacker more of an advantage though, so maybe a positive move?
This is my signature
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: d3monstrate
Date: Sun 19 Apr 20:20
Like all the other rules, until they properly define the playing area of the body, there will still be some decisions causing controversy like we already have
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: arpar
Date: Sun 19 Apr 20:54
Quote:
Milos Drizzle, Sun 19 Apr 20:11
Always said, as said above, all this does is shift the “baw hair” decisions back to the other side of the body. Does give the attacker more of an advantage though, so maybe a positive move?
At least the attacker would look offside with that ruleset. Much like all the games outside VAR are currently judged where the attacker gets the benefit of the doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
