|
|
Topic Originator: ipswichpar
Date: Fri 31 May 20:58
Hope he never sees outside a cell again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Fri 31 May 21:00
Well he might do in seven years.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Sun 2 Jun 10:52
No problem with the defence pleas. That's what a lawyer is supposed, in fact is honoured to do, represent the defendant to the best of his ability. My problem is with the judge imposing a minimum tarrif of only seven years. If that is what the law says is the maximum term that he could hand down then the law needs changed.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: JTH123
Date: Sun 2 Jun 16:06
Maybe so but its not a pretty sight when every underhand dirty tactic is used in court to defend some scumbag. I was a juror in a case a few years ago and the way that innocent witnesses were spoken to by the defence lawyer in his attempt to discredit their evidence was disgusting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Mon 3 Jun 14:51
The minimum seems far too low but it is in reality irrelevant. The OLR will almost certainly mean he never gets out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
