|
|
Topic Originator: Paralex
Date: Tue 4 Feb 14:42
There seems to be a lot more to this case than meets the eye. Good that MP David Davis is lending his considerable weight to the situation. A figure who commands some respect. Seems that those who accused Ms Letby had most to lose if she wasn`t convicted. Let`s see how this one goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Tue 4 Feb 15:14
So she didn’t murder them, just provided “bad medical care” and accidentally injected them with oxygen…….so instead of murder its culpable homicide - let her rot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Playup_Pompey
Date: Tue 4 Feb 15:22
guess finding out who wrote the "confessions" in her personal diary as well will unlock the real killer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 4 Feb 15:26
Apparently she wasn`t working when some of the incidents happened, further investigations required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: ipswichpar
Date: Tue 4 Feb 16:33
I thought it was the case she was on duty when all of those incidents happened, but was not on duty when other similar things happened (and they were not included in the case). But perhaps I`m wrong (in which case I`m very keen to be corrected).
Unfortunately human thinking and appropriate use of data often are not well aligned. I guess seeing threats that aren`t actually there has played a key role in keeping humans alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 4 Feb 16:43
sadindifreak called this last August .. saying the prosecution evidence was flawed and in time would go down as a miscarriage of justice .. There is still more to come .. lets hope they get it right .. feel so sorry for all the Families being dragged back through this again RIP all the babies
Post Edited (Tue 04 Feb 16:45)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: sadindiefreak
Date: Tue 4 Feb 17:02
Quote:
Buspasspar, Tue 4 Feb 16:43
sadindifreak called this last August .. saying the prosecution evidence was flawed and in time would go down as a miscarriage of justice .. There is still more to come .. lets hope they get it right .. feel so sorry for all the Families being dragged back through this again RIP all the babies
Well remembered Buspasspar.
Since then the main prosecution witness has said he was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Tue 4 Feb 17:28
Quote:
Dave_1885, Tue 4 Feb 15:14
So she didn’t murder them, just provided “bad medical care” and accidentally injected them with oxygen…….so instead of murder its culpable homicide - let her rot.
This is precisely the mentality that confirms the death penalty should never return
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Tue 4 Feb 18:01
Quote:
PARrot, Tue 4 Feb 17:28
Quote:
Dave_1885, Tue 4 Feb 15:14
So she didn’t murder them, just provided “bad medical care” and accidentally injected them with oxygen…….so instead of murder its culpable homicide - let her rot.
This is precisely the mentality that confirms the death penalty should never return
Didn’t say anything about killing her 😂 it’s also why I agree that the death penalty should never return. But currently she is guilty of killing numerous babies. Until that’s completely overturned and proven to be false on ALL counts, she can rot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Paralex
Date: Tue 4 Feb 18:04
Glad to be on the same wavelength as sadindiefreak. From the documentary I saw the injection with oxygen was an flawed accusation and the entry in the diary could have a very different meaning from being a confession. She may have been led to believe that she was guilty of the deaths, when she wasn`t. Hopefully this case gets a proper viewing, in light of the new evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Wotsit
Date: Tue 4 Feb 20:22
The first serious question I remember hearing was when loads of statisticians cast huge doubt on some of the statistical methods used in the prosecution`s evidence.
The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: twin par
Date: Tue 4 Feb 22:28
I might be proved wrong here,but I never believed she was guilty. She was the fall guy.
Post Edited (Tue 04 Feb 22:29)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Tue 4 Feb 22:30
Correct me if wrong - but did not senior staff such as consultants flag up their concerns and these went unactioned by the management ?
If so, a properly conducted review of the cases and further investigation might well have prevented more tragic baby deaths.
The initial verdict was eventually appealed if memory serves and upheld.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Paralex
Date: Wed 5 Feb 00:29
Yes, the Court of Appeal turned down the request for an appeal on the 24th October 2024. Things have ramped up further to that. I don`t have loads of respect for many Tories but David Davis is certainly one I very much respect. I have a hunch he will help to get this case reviewed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Wed 5 Feb 08:46
Time will tell. What I found odd was the reporting of her scrawls in a notepad. Those could have of someone who felt guilt over a death despite not being the cause or intending to cause death. Like a driver who knocks down and kills a child who runs out in front of them might feel it was their fault. Maybe if they`d been going slightly slower or had left slightly later or had the brakes replaced at the last MOT when they were an advisory etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Wed 5 Feb 09:56
The raft of neonatal experts are certainly providing different evidence to that of the original trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
