|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 1 Dec 09:23
Decided to have a statue in the Downing Street garden, bought for £1.3 million!
Funny how MSM not reporting on this and of course Michelle Mone and her financial shenanigans.
Does Sunak even live in Downing Street?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: ipswichpar
Date: Thu 1 Dec 10:49
He does now. I saw pictures of his missus driving a hire van the other week to move her kit back in.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parsfan
Date: Thu 1 Dec 11:06
You`d think The Tax Payers Alliance would be all over this (the Mone thing and similar).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The universe is ruled by chance and indifference
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parathletic
Date: Thu 1 Dec 11:47
No fan of the Tories but it wasn`t bought.It is rotated along with other works at the request of the Henry Moore charitable foundation apparently.Not great PR ar this time though.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Sat 24 Dec 08:57
So Sunak on telly serving out food in a homeless shelter, asks the person he`s serving if he`s in business?🤔😲🤬
He doesn`t even get a red neck!
Post Edited (Sat 24 Dec 08:58)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: GG Riva
Date: Sat 24 Dec 10:07
Quote:
LochgellyAlbert, Sat 24 Dec 08:57
So Sunak on telly serving out food in a homeless shelter, asks the person he`s serving if he`s in business?🤔😲🤬
He doesn`t even get a red neck!
Surprised at you, LA. Tories don`t do red necks.
They are totally shameless.
Not your average Sunday League player.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dd23
Date: Sat 24 Dec 10:33
And detached from reality.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Sat 24 Dec 11:18
At least they believe a man’s a man for a’ that…
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Sat 24 Dec 12:19
Saw him tapping his watch and saying .."come on hurry along ..some of us have got homes to go to"
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 27 Dec 17:56
Rees Mogg hints that he is going to run for Tory leadership!🤣🤣🤣
Post Edited (Tue 27 Dec 17:57)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 27 Dec 18:10
Lord Snooty .. heaven help us .. :-((
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Wed 25 Jan 13:10
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/prigozhin-labour-jeremy-hunt-russia-ukraine-eliot-higgins-libel/
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 25 Jan 16:43
Britain is globally notorious for our willingness to shield oligarchs from other countries, to help them move and increase their wealth, and this has been highly profitable to a decent-sized chunk of our professional classes for decades.
But now is the moment when the government must show whose side it’s on: that of the oligarchs, or that of their victims.
No amount of chat about standing with Ukraine, and no number of photo opportunities with Volodymyr Zelensky, will disguise the truth if it makes the wrong choices now.
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 25 Jan 18:11
There are many who should now be in gaol LA .. lying cheating theiving Bastar*s
Sunak included .. he really is a weasel
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Wed 25 Jan 19:06
Just confirmed that he has paid penalties to HMRC!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 25 Jan 19:32
Maybe we should get him on the bench for our next penalty shootout LA :-))
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Wed 25 Jan 20:32
I`m no defender of Sunak but hasn`t he confirmed that he has NOT paid any penalties to HMRC?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 25 Jan 21:01
Think LA was meaning Zahawi wee eck .. might be wrong tho
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Wed 25 Jan 21:16
I thought that was yesterday`s news? This thread`s about Sunak.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 25 Jan 21:22
Ach I get mixed up sometimes as ye ken wee eck :-)
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Wed 25 Jan 21:56
In fairness it`s hard to keep up with that mob, Bpp! Another day, another scandal!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 31 Jan 19:18
All liars and cheats LA .. and laughing at us
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 1 Feb 20:05
Good again LA .. and so it continues .. but the damage is done they have achieved their objective .. make the rich richer and fek everybody else .. Scum
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 7 Feb 08:27
They cannot lie straight in bed LA
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 7 Feb 16:37
Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic just now, some scandal about the new chairman breaking tomorrow!
30p Lee the vice chairman!!
How low can they sink???
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 7 Feb 20:01
Another one oh yer icebergs LA :-))
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Wed 8 Feb 16:55
Quote:
LochgellyAlbert, Tue 7 Feb 16:37
Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic just now, some scandal about the new chairman breaking tomorrow!
30p Lee the vice chairman!!
How low can they sink???
Apparently cost of reshuffle is £60 million, new door for House of Lords is £7 million and Charles and Camillas new thrones £???.
And they say there`s no money?🤔😲🤬🐽🐽🐽
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Wed 8 Feb 17:08
Forgot to mention that they want £162,000 if not re-elected!
That`s going to be a massive payout!🤬🤬🤬
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 8 Feb 20:54
The Party for the People
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Wed 8 Feb 22:48
The spend on maintaining these old buildings is a disgrace. Move parliament to a building that is fit for purpose with accommodation for MPs then make Westminster a museum and charge tourists £10 a pop to hear all the bollocks about black rod and all that nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 9 Feb 13:51
Sunak returned from Cornwall by helicopter last night and then flew back to Dorset by jet this morning! You would think he could have found a cheap B&B somewhere to stay the night and protect the Exchequer and the planet!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Thu 9 Feb 15:41
The way he wis dolled up wi Zelensky I think he probably flew them himself .. wee eck
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Sun 12 Feb 19:21
There has to be .. must be ..Gaol sentences .. for these lying cheating scum LA
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Mon 20 Feb 12:37
Sunak will have to watch his back this week with the blond blob making a nuisance of himself, once again!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Tue 28 Feb 11:24
Sunak on the `Windsor Framework` (is there someone employed just to invent these names?) :-
`If we get this right, if we get this framework implemented, if we get the executive back up and running here, Northern Ireland is in the unbelievably special position – unique position in the entire world, European continent – in having privileged access, not just to the UK home market, which is enormous, the fifth biggest in the world, but also the European Union single market. Nobody else has that. No one. Only you guys. Only here. And that is the prize.
I can tell you, when I go around the world and talk to businesses, they know. They’re like, ‘That’s interesting, if you guys get this sorted, then we want to invest in Northern Ireland.’
Because nowhere else does that that exist. That’s like the world’s most exciting economic zone.`
Unbelievable from someone who voted for Brexit because he thought it would benefit UK trade.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 28 Feb 12:56
Northern Ireland will have access to the UK market and to the European single market, and that’s an incredibly attractive proposition for investors.”
Well I think that was what the UK had, before they pulled the Brexit card!
As someone has said, if we had threatened violence Scotland might get the same deal?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Tue 28 Feb 13:44
Who’s we?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 12 Mar 17:19
What a non-story
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Sun 12 Mar 17:46
If the story doesn`t upset you, whilst other people freeze, then I give up!
He will claim it all back through expenses. 😡
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 12 Mar 19:21
Why pick on him? He`s not the only rich person in the country last time I checked
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 12 Mar 20:08
He`s the only one who is PM though.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 12 Mar 22:31
I must`ve missed the revelation that he`s the only politician who has money.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Tad Allagash
Date: Mon 13 Mar 15:23
Better a rich politician than a poor one who wants to be rich.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Mon 13 Mar 16:03
What`s the rationale behind that?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Tad Allagash
Date: Mon 13 Mar 16:24
wee eck wrote:
> What`s the rationale behind that?
>
>
It’s harder to bribe someone who doesn’t need the money.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Mon 13 Mar 16:55
I assume you must be referring to Tory MPs.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Tad Allagash
Date: Mon 13 Mar 17:30
wee eck wrote:
> I assume you must be referring to Tory MPs.
>
>
Was your first clue the title of the thread?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: DBP
Date: Mon 13 Mar 17:41
Quote:
Tad Allagash, Mon 13 Mar 16:24
wee eck wrote:
> What`s the rationale behind that?
>
It’s harder to bribe someone who doesn’t need the money.
May be harder to bribe them (although recent history would challenge that), but you could argue that maintaining their own personal wealth will be front and centre (and hidden behind) off their policies and actions
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Tue 14 Mar 11:27
There`s a naive assumption that the poor want to be richer. Society displays that the "poor" are generally satisfied with their lot.
If only we had a recent example of a very wealthy PM who complained about his paltry wage and was getting "donations" to do up his Downing Street home.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Tue 14 Mar 11:55
Tories have always assumed that everyone is motivated in the same way they are - by money and power.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Aylesbury_Par
Date: Tue 14 Mar 12:25
Where does a heated swimming pool fit into Maslows hierarchy of needs?
Is it above food, water & warmth?
Post Edited (Tue 14 Mar 12:27)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Tue 14 Mar 14:01
A sandwich in the bath. Sorted…
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 14 Mar 17:11
And to think he will get all that electricity from Scotland once the cable is laid from Aberdeen, meanwhile Scotland will continue to pay the highest energy prices in the World. 😡
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 14 Mar 17:24
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Tue 14 Mar 14:01
A sandwich in the bath. Sorted…
Genuine LOL at that :-)
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: McCaig`s Tower
Date: Thu 16 Mar 22:08
There`s a naive assumption that the poor want to be richer. Society displays that the "poor" are generally satisfied with their lot.
Really? That seems an extraordinary thing to say. Who are "the poor" in this case?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Thu 16 Mar 22:58
What`s extraordinary about it? Some people are driven by money, some people aren`t. Unsurprisingly, it`s the greedy who are typically most driven by money. Perhaps "poor" isn`t the right term, but essentially anyone who isn`t considered typically rich.
There`s a term you can use for this - the golden handcuffs. You have enough to be "comfortable" (the golden) but that then restricts you (the handcuffs) as you no longer desire to earn more.
Give people just enough not to complain and you`ll be fine.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Wotsit
Date: Thu 23 Mar 07:49
People rarely get rich by devoting their lives to improving the situatuation for the less fortunate.
The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.
Post Edited (Thu 23 Mar 07:49)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Thu 23 Mar 08:12
But it`s not actually his fault he pays less tax than someone on minimum wage. It`s tax rules that allow it that are the problem.
I pay the higher rate of tax in Scotland but I`m sure I could legally wangle it to pay less (pay more pension, sign up for pre-tax investments on my pay etc.).
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 23 Mar 08:26
Isn`t the main reason for the apparent inequality of taxes between rich and poor that capital gains, which are more available to the rich, are taxed more favourably than income? No government seems to be prepared to change that.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Wotsit
Date: Thu 23 Mar 15:59
Aye, you pay more tax if you toil for your living than you do on passive income. It makes no sense until you think about where most MPs` income is accrued.
The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 23 Mar 17:14
The Guardian reports that Rishi Sunak has saved more than £300,000 in tax thanks to a cut he voted for in 2016, according to an analysis of his tax records. The prime minister has paid just over £1m in tax over the past three years, most of which was accrued on the gains he has made on his US-based investment portfolio. But that figure would have been £308,167 higher had the top rate of capital gains tax (CGT) not been cut by the Conservative government in 2016.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: P
Date: Fri 24 Mar 12:33
Quote:
wee eck, Thu 23 Mar 08:26
Isn`t the main reason for the apparent inequality of taxes between rich and poor that capital gains, which are more available to the rich, are taxed more favourably than income? No government seems to be prepared to change that.
Capital Gains Tax allowances are halved to £6k this year and halved again the following year to £3k.
This will bring a lot more people into scope of paying CGT especially those who have sharesave / SAYE with their work (schemes that are not the sole preserve of the wealthy). If you’re making capital gains in the hundreds of thousands the change is not material but if you make a modest profit on your savings then look forward to paying tax
….unless you route it through an ISA wrapper
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 24 Mar 16:53
The main bug bear is that he pays the same rate of tax as Joe Soap!🤔😲😡
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: McCaig`s Tower
Date: Fri 24 Mar 21:16
So Mr Sunak has published his return. What does it tell us?
Meanwhile CGT is a strange one – in some circumstance the asset doesn’t change intrinsically, it only gets notionally more valuable due to changes in interest rates or inflation (by which you used to be able to offset any increase in value). But I guess you have the option not to sell. Unless your assets are in a blind trust – perhaps the trustees should have waited until Sunak had got round to abolishing CGT altogether?
Of course taxation of different asset types is different to reflect their different provenances. For example dividends will often arise from shares that have been bought with money already taxed and will be paid from profits subject to corporation tax. And often tweaking the tax rates is designed to influence fiscal behaviour at a second order level. Perhaps the large scale movement of assets from equities into bonds as pension schemes mature necessitates different incentives?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Wed 29 Mar 17:53
From the Beeb .. gaol the lot of them !
Rishi Sunak is facing questions over shares his wife holds in a childcare agency that could benefit from a new policy unveiled in the Budget.
The Chancellor announced a pilot of payments for new childminders with more for those who sign through agencies.
Akshata Murty was listed as a shareholder in one of those agencies, Koru Kids, as recently as 6 March.
The prime minister`s press secretary said all Mr Sunak`s interests "have been declared in the usual way".
Ministers are expected to provide a written list of all financial interests that might "give rise to a conflict".
Mr Sunak mentions Ms Murthy`s venture capital company, Catamaran Ventures, in his list of ministerial interests, but does not mention Koru Kids.
The PM also did not mention Ms Murthy`s links to Koru Kids when he was questioned by MPs over the policy at a parliamentary committee hearing on Tuesday.
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Wed 29 Mar 18:33
To be fair, it must be difficult to keep track of all your investments if you`re a billionaire.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Wed 29 Mar 21:03
The money was just resting in his wife`s account...
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Mon 17 Apr 16:48
Why is this being reported by the BBC and other outlets of the mainstream media? They are supposed to be pro Tory and should be ignoring such stories.
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Mon 17 Apr 17:24
Pro-Tory doesn`t necessarily mean pro-Sunak.
When are we going to get a decision on the appointment of that Tory supporter as Chairman of the BBC? It seems to be taking ages.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Mon 24 Apr 19:24
Failed to turn up today to answer an "Urgent Question " in Westminster regarding his wife`s financial affairs.
Since she was openly canvassing for the Tories in Watford yesterday, she has become political.
Infosys also involved in yesterday`s national emergency warnings, sub contracted by Fujitsu, them of the Post Office debacle!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Mon 24 Apr 19:30
At least he can tell the difference between England and Glasgow 😂
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Fri 28 Apr 15:40
I see he has managed to antagonise the Scottish media pack at the Tory conference in Glasgow by trying to handpick 6 centre-right reporters to attend his press briefing. Even the chosen 6 objected, showing more integrity and accountability than Sunak did.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Fri 28 Apr 16:05
Rishi Sunak has ruled out any further devolution of powers for Scotland after telling Conservative activists that Holyrood should be “held to account” more for underusing its existing powers. The prime minister claimed Holyrood already had significant powers, including over income tax rates, telling delegates at the Scottish Conservatives’ annual conference in Glasgow there was therefore no case for adding to them.
``Scotland already is the most powerful devolved assembly anywhere in the world,” he said during a question-and-answer session chaired by Douglas Ross, the Scottish Tory leader. ``The SNP and the Scottish government doesn’t even use the powers they already have, so we shouldn’t start talking about any more. What we need to do is hold them to account.``
Is there any evidence that we have `the most powerful devolved assembly anywhere in the world`? I`ve never seen the point of having some control over income tax if you don`t have control over any indirect taxes. And we`ve just seen an example of a majority comprising members of all major parties passing legislation in Scotland which Westminster can apparently veto.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Fri 28 Apr 16:08
He is a weasel
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: auldpar
Date: Fri 28 Apr 16:25
My friend in Madrid tells me that the Catalan government has far more powers than Holyrood. I don`t have evidence but he`s a corporate lawyer with Iberdrola who, incidentally, own Scottish Power, so I guess he has some insight in the matter.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 28 Apr 17:39
Speaking to a full house apparently?🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Sat 13 May 11:35
Rumours of him being ousted and another leadership election coming, they`ll get it right sometime!
I just wish they would go and let Starmer continue with their policies!🤣🙃🤣🙃🤣🙃
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Tue 4 Jul 17:25
Have we ever had a more spineless PM .. well at least he`s no hiding in a freezer
Rishi Sunak has refused to say whether Tory MPs accused of undermining the Commons Partygate inquiry into Boris Johnson should apologise.
The Privileges Committee said last week that the MPs, including Nadine Dorries and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, had tried to "interfere" with the probe.
Asked whether they should say sorry, the prime minister didn`t say, adding he hadn`t read the committee`s report.
MPs will decide whether to approve the findings at a debate next Monday.
Last month, the Commons backed the committee`s finding, in a separate report, that Mr Johnson misled Parliament over Covid rule-breaking in No 10.
Mr Sunak has never said whether he agrees with the findings of that report - and missed last month`s vote to approve it, blaming a diary clash.
He seems to favour the "not reading the report" get out clause
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 4 Jul 20:39
He has decided to miss the next 2 PM`s questions before the recess, the most a PM has ever been absent from!
Cowardly doesn`t even come close 🤬💩
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dd23
Date: Wed 5 Jul 15:51
The more I listen to him the more I despise him. Cowardly, spineless and morally bankrupt. Just the latest in a seemingly never ending line of Tory destroyers. The sooner we’re out of the Uk the better.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: GG Riva
Date: Thu 6 Jul 12:57
Quote:
dd23, Wed 5 Jul 15:51
The more I listen to him the more I despise him. Cowardly, spineless and morally bankrupt. Just the latest in a seemingly never ending line of Tory destroyers. The sooner we’re out of the Uk the better.
I was worried when he eventually became PM that he might make a decent fist of the job and the Tories might somehow weasel themselves in for another stint in power at the next election.
I needn`t have worried - he`s as odious, deceitful and duplicitous as all his Tory cronies.
Not your average Sunday League player.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Thu 6 Jul 13:38
dd23..Is that an abbreviation of dream died 2023?
How apt, the SNP imploding and the likelihood of us leaving the UK even less than 2014. You could always leave though instead of whining about it
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: dd23
Date: Thu 6 Jul 15:28
Quote:
GG Riva, Thu 06 Jul 12:57
Quote:
dd23, Wed 5 Jul 15:51
The more I listen to him the more I despise him. Cowardly, spineless and morally bankrupt. Just the latest in a seemingly never ending line of Tory destroyers. The sooner we’re out of the Uk the better.
I was worried when he eventually became PM that he might make a decent fist of the job and the Tories might somehow weasel themselves in for another stint in power at the next election.
I needn`t have worried - he`s as odious, deceitful and duplicitous as all his Tory cronies.
😂😂😂😂😂
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Thu 6 Jul 20:52
The government has lost its legal challenge to prevent the Covid inquiry from seeing Boris Johnson`s WhatsApps, diaries and notebooks in full.
The Cabinet Office had argued it should not have to hand over irrelevant material, but inquiry chair Baroness Hallett said it should be up to her to decide what is relevant.
The government has accepted the ruling.
It also asked to see messages from other politicians including current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
Should be Interesting :-)
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Andrew283
Date: Thu 6 Jul 23:37
Quote:
Buspasspar, Thu 6 Jul 20:52
The government has lost its legal challenge to prevent the Covid inquiry from seeing Boris Johnson`s WhatsApps, diaries and notebooks in full.
The Cabinet Office had argued it should not have to hand over irrelevant material, but inquiry chair Baroness Hallett said it should be up to her to decide what is relevant.
The government has accepted the ruling.
It also asked to see messages from other politicians including current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
Should be Interesting :-)
They`ll be found guilty, wrist slapped, carry on as normal
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Fri 7 Jul 07:59
If soap box Sturgeon’s master class in memory loss and evasiveness during her Salmond enquiry evidence is anything to go by there won’t be anything to hand over here…
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 7 Jul 17:20
Some scary names being quoted as replacements, out of the frying pan into the fire!🙈😲🤬🤬🤬💩💩💩
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Andrew283
Date: Sat 8 Jul 00:19
If we get yet ANOTHER replacement PM, it just shows this country needs major reforms. It`s a joke they can fail, sack the PM and continue on pretending everything has changed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Sat 8 Jul 10:19
Two out of the last three FM’s have been arrested..
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Sat 8 Jul 13:23
Quote:
Parboiled, Sat 8 Jul 10:19
Two out of the last three FM’s have been arrested..
And charged with what?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: alwaysaPar
Date: Sat 8 Jul 13:47
Quote:
Parboiled, Sat 8 Jul 10:19
Two out of the last three FM’s have been arrested..
New Post needed for that or one of the old ones or even another forum completely.................
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Sat 8 Jul 13:49
Two counts of attempted rape, nine of sexual assault, two of indecent assault and one of breach of the peace. That was for Salmond. No charges yet against Sturgeon.
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Sat 8 Jul 13:58
They were arrested
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sat 8 Jul 14:00
Wasn`t Salmond found not guilty on all counts? I`m not clear what this has got to do with Sunak bombing in the polls?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Andrew283
Date: Sun 9 Jul 02:18
Quote:
wee eck, Sat 8 Jul 14:00
Wasn`t Salmond found not guilty on all counts? I`m not clear what this has got to do with Sunak bombing in the polls?
Nothing. Usual whataboutery. Wonder if Gove will finally get his coke snorting puss in for Rishis replacement
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Sun 9 Jul 11:00
Coke? Wait till Scoot and his fellow bams decriminalise all drugs … we’ve already got the worst death rate in Europe, now we’re gonna be the UK destination for users.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Sun 9 Jul 16:44
Quote:
Parboiled, Sun 9 Jul 11:00
Coke? Wait till Scoot and his fellow bams decriminalise all drugs … we’ve already got the worst death rate in Europe, now we’re gonna be the UK destination for users.
Parboiled, we`ve already confirmed you're a Daily Mail reader so I`ll explain things to you as per usual.
Decriminalisation isn`t the same as being legal. Decriminalisation is already implemented elsewhere,.most notably in Portugal where it has proven to be highly successful.
Of course, I`m sure you`ll tell me of your own amazing plan to resolve unnecessary drug deaths?
Post Edited (Sun 09 Jul 16:45)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Sun 9 Jul 16:47
Back on topic :-
I think I need to offer an apology
I have been comparing the wee back stabbing spineless misanthrope with a weasel
So here goes :-
Sorry weasels you did not deserve such an insult
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: parsfan
Date: Sun 9 Jul 17:55
Quote:
jake89, Sun 9 Jul 16:44
Quote:
Parboiled, Sun 9 Jul 11:00
Coke? Wait till Scoot and his fellow bams decriminalise all drugs … we’ve already got the worst death rate in Europe, now we’re gonna be the UK destination for users.
Parboiled, we`ve already confirmed you`re a Daily Mail reader so I`ll explain things to you as per usual.
Decriminalisation isn`t the same as being legal. Decriminalisation is already implemented elsewhere,.most notably in Portugal where it has proven to be highly successful.
Of course, I`m sure you`ll tell me of your own amazing plan to resolve unnecessary drug deaths?
Why would he/they need a solution?
They don`t care about the typical person who dies in these circumstances and it provides a good stick with which to beat the Scottish government/SNP.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The universe is ruled by chance and indifference
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 9 Jul 18:27
The opposition are forever using Scotland`s high drugs death to criticise the SG but, when they came up with the suggestion to decriminalise possession for private use, Anas Sarwar questioned why this was a priority when there was a cost of living crisis etc!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Sun 9 Jul 18:31
7 Jul 2023
Commenting on the Scottish Government’s new “A Caring, Compassionate and Human Rights Informed Drug Policy for Scotland”, Professor Angela Thomas, Director of Heritage at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, and co-author of the introduction to the College’s report on drug deaths, said:
The College welcomes the publication of this significant policy document and believes that it makes a number of extremely important recommendations which align with positions we have put forward in recent years based on the views of leading medical experts and clinicians.
We fully support taking a public health approach to tackling the drug deaths emergency in Scotland and we will continue to give our backing to key initiatives like overdose prevention centres which have the potential to save lives.
As our report in 2021 did, we call on the Scottish and UK Governments to work together as constructively as possible to reduce the level of drug deaths and to look at how these proposals might be taken forward; many would benefit all parts of the UK.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 21 Jul 09:51
Tories hold onto Uxbridge, BJ`s former seat!
I thought they were supposed to be bright🤔🤬
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Mon 31 Jul 23:12
Oh, Rishi:
https://youtu.be/55QdEfQDWwI
As an FYI, there are at least three commercial airlines who run daily flights between London and Aberdeen.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bandy
Date: Thu 8 Feb 12:00
He has the emotional intelligence of an amoeba.
Regardless of your views on various aspects of the trans debate, the time and place to express those views is not in front of the mother of the victim of a transphobic murder.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Andrew283
Date: Thu 8 Feb 18:26
God I hope the Tory party are dead come election time.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 8 Feb 19:02
You`ve got to wonder who`s advising him. Who thought it would be a good idea to spend an hour with Piers Morgan? After yesterday`s faux pas he went off to a dental practice today to launch his plan for NHS dentistry in England. The practice he visited isn`t taking on any NHS patients.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Thu 8 Feb 19:12
Came out today to pretty much say protests are no longer welcome if they are against Israel too 🤷🏻♂️ police state incoming for England and civil war is heading their way looking at Twitter 😂 glad we only have to worry about the Proddy and Catholic divide up our end! 😂
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Fri 9 Feb 16:58
Prime minister Rishi Sunak has published his personal tax return.
The tax return shows that the prime minister paid more than half a million pounds in UK tax last year.
Who said Rishi wasn`t in touch with the average Brit? I wonder how much you have to earn to pay that amount of tax?!!!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 9 Feb 17:02
Was he not paying the standard rate 21p in the pound?
His wife`s tax affairs would be very intriguing!🤔
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Fri 9 Feb 17:41
Here`s the breakdown from the BBC :-
Rishi Sunak paid UK tax of £508,308 on earnings of just over £2.2m last year, according to his latest tax summary.
The document, published by Downing Street, showed the prime minister paid £163,364 in tax on a total income of £432,884.
He also paid £359,240 in tax on around £1.8m in capital gains from a US-based investment fund.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buspasspar
Date: Fri 9 Feb 18:06
So He`s no short oh a Bob wee eck .. and yet they want even more by trying and some times succeding in cheating the tax system
We are forever shaped by the Children we once were
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Fri 9 Feb 18:57
I suppose we should be grateful that someone smart enough to make that kind of money has taken time out to run the country. Unfortunately it looks like the skills aren`t transferable.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Fri 9 Feb 20:55
Never reached the top taxpayers list!🤔
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Sat 10 Feb 09:21
Quote:
LochgellyAlbert, Fri 9 Feb 17:02
Was he not paying the standard rate 21p in the pound?
His wife`s tax affairs would be very intriguing!🤔
He is paying 23% tax on his earnings, £1.8 million went through as Capital Gains which was taxed at 20%.
Good to see that he has something in common with the common worker!🤬🤬🤬
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Sat 10 Feb 10:18
As PM he will surely be paying more than 23% on his earnings? Unless he`s pulled a Lorraine Kelly or Gary Lineker number on the taxman.
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Sat 10 Feb 10:26
Quote:
The One Who Knocks, Sat 10 Feb 10:18
As PM he will surely be paying more than 23% on his earnings? Unless he`s pulled a Lorraine Kelly or Gary Lineker number on the taxman.
Tax avoidance/ dodge explained above!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Parboiled
Date: Sat 10 Feb 10:33
Meanwhile saint Nicola sets up a tax avoidance scheme on her book earnings.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Sat 10 Feb 10:39
Quote:
Parboiled, Sat 10 Feb 10:33
Meanwhile saint Nicola sets up a tax avoidance scheme on her book earnings.
Clutching at straws now!🤔🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Mon 12 Feb 09:28
A Sunak broadcast tonight on GB News, all the yoons will be tuned in!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 13 Feb 11:58
Invited audience (paid) turns up to give Sunak an easy time.
Meanwhile Infosys has their best year (2023)for Government contracts!
Also Cleverly makes a Government statement about preventing fraud!🤔🤣🤣🤣💰💰💰
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: McCaig`s Tower
Date: Tue 13 Feb 13:51
Meanwhile Infosys has their best year (2023)for Government contracts!
Are you suggesting the Government shouldn`t use Infosys?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Tue 13 Feb 14:18
LA did you actually see that GB news audience gig with Sunak? I`ve just watched some Scottish bloke on it going on about the dangers of the covid vaccine and and all that and I certainly don`t think Sunak would have picked him to pose a question.
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Tue 13 Feb 16:25
Quote:
McCaig`s Tower, Tue 13 Feb 13:51
Meanwhile Infosys has their best year (2023)for Government contracts!
Are you suggesting the Government shouldn`t use Infosys?
Depends if it was open for tender?
Or was it another VIP backhander/hand action from Sunak`s wife?🤔💰💰💰
Or maybe the competition was Fujitsu?🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Tue 13 Feb 17:41
I wonder if the Scottish Government has any contracts with Infosys and if they do why would they???
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Thu 15 Feb 08:35
New poll suggesting Tories could end up with less than 90 seats.
SNP likely to lose 3 seats.
This is what is called a Mega poll. Over 18000 polled
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Thu 15 Feb 10:36
If so quite incredible in regards to the he Tories collapse and the resilience of the SNP vote. I suspect neither will happen to such a degree come the autumn.
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 15 Feb 11:48
Tory and Labour, 2 cheeks off the same erse!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: moviescot
Date: Thu 15 Feb 13:41
Quote:
The One Who Knocks, Thu 15 Feb 10:36
If so quite incredible in regards to the he Tories collapse and the resilience of the SNP vote. I suspect neither will happen to such a degree come the autumn.
The company who did this poll successfully predicted the last couple of elections pretty closely.
It`s probably too early to say this will happen again as there is still a while to go before the election.
Post Edited (Thu 15 Feb 13:42)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 15 Feb 13:51
Maybe independence supporters are beginning to realise that, whatever the current deficiencies of the SNP, voting for a Unionist party isn`t going to advance their cause. I saw Anas Sarwar the other night repeating that he doesn`t support independence and he doesn`t support another referendum but he wants SNP supporters to vote Labour to get rid of the Tories. Then what? Based on this latest poll Labour won`t need any help from Scottish voters to get rid of the Tories.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Andrew283
Date: Thu 15 Feb 14:30
Quote:
Parboiled, Sat 10 Feb 10:33
Meanwhile saint Nicola sets up a tax avoidance scheme on her book earnings.
Oooh, you`re desperate
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: DBP
Date: Thu 15 Feb 14:56
I had someone at my door from Labour saying the same thing… basically that I should vote Labour to remove the tories -
but then admitted that such a vote would be interpreted as a vote for the union, which would in turn be used to snuff out any referendum opportunity
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 15 Feb 16:35
Incidentally, this mega poll, published in the Daily Mirror, is predicting there will be no Tory seats in Scotland. Goodbye Bowie, Duguid, Ross, Mundell, Lamont, Jack (retiring anyway)!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: red-star-par
Date: Thu 15 Feb 17:39
Quote:
wee eck, Thu 15 Feb 16:35
Incidentally, this mega poll, published in the Daily Mirror, is predicting there will be no Tory seats in Scotland. Goodbye Bowie, Duguid, Ross, Mundell, Lamont, Jack (retiring anyway)!
That`ll be good, a shower of self serving cretins
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: jake89
Date: Thu 15 Feb 18:11
Let`s be quite honest here and accept the SNP are only doing well because Labour are so woeful and the Tories are laughable.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Thu 15 Feb 18:16
That`s usually how politics works. The SNP have hardly covered themselves in glory and are forever criticised by a hostile media but may be seen as the best of a bad bunch, especially by those who favour independence.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The One Who Knocks
Date: Fri 16 Feb 12:33
Two absolutely stonking by election wins for Labour last night overturning massive majorities.
And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: McCaig`s Tower
Date: Fri 16 Feb 19:55
Depends if it was open for tender?
I’ve never read that it wasn’t – indeed, any evidence would appear to suggest it was. In any case, I can’t believe that such procurement would be a matter for cabinet, and even if it were, surely Sunak would recuse himself.
I did a bit of digging and apparently Infosys billed HMG £7m for services last year. That doesn’t seem a lot, but let’s go with it.
How much is the net profit margin on such contracts? 20%? Probably less, but if we say 20% then that’s £1.4m profit. Suppose they pay out half as dividends, then that’s £700k paid out. Akshata Murty owns just under 1% of Infosys, so would have netted about £7k from UK Government contracts.
Meanwhile I think Infosys paid out 41c per share and Mrs Sunak owns about 40million of them, so she would have cleared about $16m pre-tax last year.
If my arithmetic is correct (please check it) then Government contracts would seem small beer.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Mon 19 Feb 12:00
Ofcom has announced that it has launched an investigation into whether the GB News People’s Forum event with Rishi Sunak last week broke impartiality rules. The show has been criticised because Sunak was not subject to the sort of comeback and challenge during the Q&A that he would get from a similar event staged by an established broadcaster like the BBC or Sky News. In his sketch in the Guardian John Crace wrote: “Nearly every Conservative MP has their own show on GB News, so it was only a matter of time before it was Rishi Sunak’s turn.”
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LochgellyAlbert
Date: Thu 7 Mar 09:54
Good to know that his father in law is getting a cut from yesterday`s budget, mainly through the NHS upgrade.
Non doms going to pay tax but not till Sunak buggers off to the USA!
|
|
|
|
|