|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 15:00
Unchanged Pars side today. COYP!
Post Edited (Sun 03 Nov 04:19)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: LiviPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 15:50
How are the pars playing anyone?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 15:53
Very even game. Could go either way. Thistle definitely an upgrade on Livi.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Jeffery
Date: Sat 2 Nov 15:56
I couldn`t be there today but from the lineups that thistle front four and back four looks impressive.
Are we pressing them like on Tuesday?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: ParsMad98
Date: Sat 2 Nov 15:56
Not much in the game, if Mebude would pass the ball and Clay could make a forward pass we could be onto somethingđ
RM DAFC
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: veteraneastender
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:02
Like watching paint dry tbh.
The second half can only get better - surely ?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:05
Substitution. KRH on for McCann for second half.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kelty_par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:09
There were two threads started about this game and only 7 posts - tells you what a turgid afair it`s been. Now it looks like Kane is injured and heading off so things not looking great at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:10
Todd is on for injured Kane.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wetherby
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:13
Sorry dont get that substitution at all. Why not bring Sutherland on or Wighton? Where is the goal threat coming from.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:17
0-1 Thistle
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:18
Clay off, Otoo on.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:22
Hamilton missed a sitter after brilliant work on the left from Mebude.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: pars no1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:27
Normal service resumes. No shots on target
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:31
Cooper on for Hamilton.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: pacifist
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:34
BBC reporting a shot on target. 8 shots v Thistles 6.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bannockburn Par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:34
Normal service resumesâŚ.honestly Mcpake needs sacking.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Bod1004
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:36
Why not bringing a forward on , surely give Sutherland a chance
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kelty_par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:37
We`ve looked dangerous when we move it quicker and run at them but honestly looks like we can play all night and not score. They are time wasting and throwing themselves down, and we`re losing the plot a bit.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wulliepar57
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:38
Right now I would take an OG for us !
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: pacifist
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:39
a draw would put us above morton
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:41
Tobi carelessly handles on edge of the box.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:46
Sutherland and Wighton on. Come on Pars! We must get a point out of this!!!!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wetherby
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:49
Would have given us more of a chance if Wighton and Sutherland wre brought on 15/20 mins earlier.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:49
Officials have had an absolute stinker today which has not favoured us
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: red-star-par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:50
6 subs? How many are allowed these days
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kozmasrightfoot
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:51
The damp slither of cheap sellotape falls off. Quèll surprisè.
F#lkirk winning 6-0.
The bottom 3 as it stands will be the bottom 3 at the end of the season (the positions of the 3 teams may change though).
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: xgatespars
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:54
Something seriously wrong when your no hitting shots on target and making the keeper work. At home!! Back down to reality in such a short space of time is so heart breaking!!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wulliepar57
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:55
As we all know scoring Goals is our problem !
helps though if we could hit the target and make the keep work a wee bit 2 shots on target doesn`t set the heather alight ,
thinking we Probably used our Goal tally up against Livi for the next lot of games
And it doesn`t give me any confidence about getting anything from the game next week ,
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: OzPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:57
It is 4 a.m. here in Oz, and I am so over the Pars right now. Not an effing shot on goal. I`m sick to the teeth of this!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: xgatespars
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:57
Pretty sure it`s just 5. Although I`m sure something was brought in with head knocks, if there`s been 1 today that is.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: pacifist
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:57
9 shots of which 2 were on target. Partick had 6 shots. We had 6 corners they had 2.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: xgatespars
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:59
That makes up for losing then!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: desparado
Date: Sat 2 Nov 16:59
One swallow doth not maketh a summer.
A McPake team playing well two games in a row is a very very rare thingâŚ
What an opportunity we missed in 2014.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: SevenTay
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:00
Kane`s substitution probably came under the head knock rule.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Stozy
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:01
Dismal, could play another 90 and not score. Shapeless after the subs. Need a change of management, across the last year and more it`s been rubbish. A few good results over the years is not good enough.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:05
Scrappy game. They took their chance. We didn`t. Harsh to lose that but if you can`t hit the target from 8 yards then that`s what happens.
I won`t be demanding we sack McPakes because of that result
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: nick_dafc1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:08
Quote:
da_no_1, Sat 2 Nov 17:05
Scrappy game. They took their chance. We didn`t. Harsh to lose that but if you can`t hit the target from 8 yards then that`s what happens.
I won`t be demanding we sack McPakes because of that result
Story of our season though. Don`t score goals. Useless too many times.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wulliepar57
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:09
We should have known he win against Livi was just False hope for us !
And as Desperado says , A mckpake team winning two games in a row is as Rare as Hen`s teeth ,
It`s moments like this that makes you wonder why the heck do we bother turning up to support the team week in and week out ! when we already know how things are going to turn out !
A point today would have taken us above Morton , Albeit on Goal difference but it would have been a step in the right direction !
Moan over but I am Pi55ed off again
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Toddyrov
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:09
Somethings got to change. Best performance of the season on Tuesday then back guff today. As soon as Kane comes off the chances of scoring goes drastically down
Effe
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: RossF
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:11
How can we play so well against Livi only to go back to the usual rubbish a few days later? Partick were poor and punished us with their second and final shot on goal. The only chances we had were Hamilton missing his open goal and Mebude being millimetres away from a cross but again we failed to test the keeper, which is disgraceful.
The squad we have should be nowhere near 9th but the performances are not good enough and that blame has to lie with McPake. Unfortunately, he looks to have the safest job in football! When did we last win a league game on a Saturday?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: TAFKA_Super_Petrie
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:12
Whens the last time we took anything from a game after conceeding first?
---------------------------------------------------------------
"People always talk about Ronaldinho and magic, but I didn't see him today. I saw Henrik Larsson; that's where the magic was."
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Lucho_8
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:13
Back to reality.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:23
I said after Tuesday let`s all take stock. Although a game of fine margins we squandered our chances and thistle took theirs. at least Airdrie took another thumping.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kelty_par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:25
Tough one to take when in reality they`ve scored from one of their few chances and Hamilton blazed our only chance over the bar when it looked easier to score.
Having said that the intensity from Tuesday was gone, the subs were poor (Ngwenya in particular coming off when he was one of the few outlets was wild) and there are serious questions needing asked again about the squad building. Wotherspoon playing means Todd is shunted out left where he`s totally ineffective in both directions. Nothing up top when Kane isn`t fit. Terrible.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Raymie the Legend
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:29
Losing the first goal was crucial. Partick could then drop off, comfortable in the knowledge that we were never going to open them up. Losing Kane was almost the knockout blow.
Very poor defending by Ngwenya, being easily beaten by the full back and then lunging in
Hamilton should be scoring and he knows more than anybody, but other than that, I donât recall another chance second half.
It`s bloody tough being a legend
Ron Atkinson - 1983
Post Edited (Sat 02 Nov 17:34)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: TommyR
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:29
I did hospitality today for the first time and that was great
But honestly I`m done now for a while.. can`t subject myself to this crap week in week out. Livingston looked a turning point but today was criminal.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:34
Yeah it was obv after 10 minutes Partick were much better and could play through our press quite comfortably. Looks a bit more like livi didnât fancy it on Tuesday.
Normal service resume, McCann like a man down but itâs not through lack of effort itâs a lack of everything else and generally we were second to everything. Partick a bigger team so we won very little in the air and once Kane went off so did any goal threat we had.
Mebude can be good but one of these guys where 9/10 heâs not going to look up try a pass and will then lose the ball. Young had his worst game I have seen, couldnât pass water today.
Back to looking like a squad lacking championship level attacking options and if Kane is out for any games itâs back to rarely looking like scoring.
We have a decent lower championship squad if everyone has a good game but thatâs not going to happen very often.
Mention for KRH tho who looked better when he came on, he should have done enough to start next game with mccann dropping out.
Post Edited (Sat 02 Nov 17:37)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:37
No end product again. Final pass, finishing, attacking headers all lacking today.
Shows how inconsistent our attackers are as well - KRH put a wonderful ball in at one point, then from an easier position manages to drill one against their first manâŚâŚ.if Dapo had a left foot he may have gotten a shot off from a great position in run up to Hamilton chance - which was howling in itself.
On a small side note - how far off it does Todd look? Looked today like he had lost any pace that he had before his lay off. Surprised he was selected over Sutherland/Wighton up top for Kane as looked like he was towing a trailer from the minute he came on.
Also not Sam Youngs best game today either, which is expected at his age. Now will see if he has the ability just now to go at this level with his next performance, or if it will lead to another Ross Graham period. (Ps not a slight on him or Graham)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kelty_par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:40
Todd is wasted on the left. He clearly doesn`t like playing there and that will be subconsciously affecting his drive, his energy levels etc. It`s a criminal waste when McPake plays him out there.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:49
A story as old as football, donât take your chances and youâll no score goals, donât score goals and youâll no win games!
Thistle had one chance and scored one goal
We had multiple chances and scored F all đ¤ˇđťââď¸
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARadise
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:55
How long is this to go on for?????
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Sat 2 Nov 17:57
Quote:
kelty_par, Sat 2 Nov 17:40
Todd is wasted on the left. He clearly doesn`t like playing there and that will be subconsciously affecting his drive, his energy levels etc. It`s a criminal waste when McPake plays him out there.
Being played out of position doesnât mean you suddenly start running like a cart horse with a tonne of coal on your backâŚ..and if thats âaffecting his driveâ then he should be nowhere near the team for now đ¤ˇđťââď¸
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: saltonsgonagetu
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:03
1.Mcpake and Mckay ain`t going anywhere till the club is sold, no business is paying out 150k.
2. Today probably 1 good Partick taken, Pars 1 good chance missed ,not much else in it.
3 . Forget top 4 we are in a 3 or 4 way fight for relegation and playoff place.
4. Our players are worthy of the level we are at .
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: buffy
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:05
I thought Ritchie-Hosler and Mebude were paired up well especially for that run down the opposite wings in the second half. How a goal didnât come from that I donât know.
âBuffyâs Buns are the finest in Fifeâ, J. Spence 2019â
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:05
We`ll finish mid table.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:10
Quote:
da_no_1, Sat 2 Nov 18:05
We`ll finish mid table.
We look like a mid table team to me. So do Partick Thistle.
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:11
I thought the legs looked a bit tired from Tuesday. We lost a goal to another back post ball. In my view, Partick are going to be there or there abouts at the end of the season. The teams were pretty even, I thought, with Partick more of a goal threat. They pressed us today and pushed and pulled their way to that result.We have definitely improved, but it is that lack of goal attempts that is hurting us. I thought a few bad touches and a few bad decisions in the final third cost us attempts on goal.if you are going to go wide and run to the byline you need to get something from it either a cross or corner. I thought when Dapo came into the centre when Kane went off, he looked much better. David Wotherspoon deserved the man of the match.
Overall, we didn`t deserve to lose, but we didn`t deserve to win. Partick are probably going to be our biggest test in this league, and I think they will be up there at the end of the season.
Players like Dapo and Todd still look a bit short of fitness so it`s about giving them game time to get them sharper.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:14
If we look like a mid table team then why are we not mid table?
Lots could change with ownership and management but if we go with what we have now then it looks like weâll be fighting it out to avoid the relegation playoffs.
Thank god for airdrie eh.
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: saltonsgonagetu
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:15
Quote:
da_no_1, Sat 2 Nov 18:05
We`ll finish mid table.
If 8th is mid table ,I will take that right now .
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:21
Quote:
Berkey, Sat 2 Nov 18:14
If we look like a mid table team then why are we not mid table?
Lots could change with ownership and management but if we go with what we have now then it looks like weâll be fighting it out to avoid the relegation playoffs.
Thank god for airdrie eh.
We didnât bring anyone in until after the season started. Weâve been playing catch up ever since but now that the squads had a bit of time together, I think we look like a mid table team. Youâre right tho, our horrendous start has put us under huge pressure and weâre basically playing from now to the end of the season with survival being the main priority.
Honestly, doesnât matter who the manager is if we are going to decide we wonât start recruitment until august.
Thatâs 2 abismal summers in the transfer market in a row
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The Boss
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:24
No chance will we get mid table with McPake in charge.
I like black and white (dreaming of black and white)
You like black and white
Run run away
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: summeragent
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:30
Bad decisions on substitutions. Once we took off Ngwenya we nullified any threat down the left and created nothing thereafter. Once Kane went off he should have bought on Sutherland immediately not Tod!
My opinion but JMc gave Partick the game with his substitutions. Wighton offers nothing and playing so long without a striker was crazy!
I want JM to succeed but he has had too long to turn this around. Itâs getting really depressing. We have good players but poor management.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:35
Quote:
summeragent, Sat 2 Nov 18:30
Bad decisions on substitutions. Once we took off Ngwenya we nullified any threat down the left and created nothing thereafter. Once Kane went off he should have bought on Sutherland immediately not Tod!
My opinion but JMc gave Partick the game with his substitutions. Wighton offers nothing and playing so long without a striker was crazy!
I want JM to succeed but he has had too long to turn this around. Itâs getting really depressing. We have good players but poor management.
Od actually say after listening to the mcpake post match he is spot on. Nothing in the game but we give them a goal from a set piece which has been an area of concern for us this year. I think this squad is probably mid table at best. We need multiple chances to score we just don`t create enough in most games.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:36
With a beefed up squad we have amassed 5 points from the last 6 games. The default league position for this squad is exactly where we are. If everyone has a good game we can give teams a decent game but Iâve seen this once maybe twice this season (giving the benefit of the doubt on the rovers game)
Weâre not moving up the table and look unlikely to be able to make the strides required to do soâŚ.ie string a few wins together like rovers have. Weâre more likely to get cut adrift along with Morton and airdrie than pull away from them.
If kane is out for any length of time weâre screwed.
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cfad
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: CrossPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 18:55
We have struggled to score goals ever since McPake took over, even the season we were promoted. He has failed to properly address the problem. No point in dominating games if you are inept in front of goals and we are definitely that. Unfortunately, Tuesday was the exception, not the rule. For that reason, can`t see anything but a fight at the bottom for us this season if nothing changes.
Absolute howling miss from Hamilton today which would have saved a point.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: KirklistonPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:01
If only we had a natural striker then we may have scored two goals today. Certainly wasnât much between the teams.we really donât deal well with defending crosses into the box. Considering we now have a fair bit of height in the team we should do better.
Itâs definitely looking like itâs going to be hard to get away from the bottom of the table. Hopefully we can ask Santa for a striker on loan, who can actually get the ball in the net.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:02
I thought the first half PT pressed us and had better touches on the ball. You can only play as well as the other side, let`s you. I thought we went wide too many times and got nothing from it. We have improved in my view and stood up much better to PT than the previous game. The last 15 minutes, they wasted time and looked a bit desperate defensively. Physiologically, I think teams are coming here now with the view that we are not such an easy team to beat from the first quarter of the season. We need to score goals to the point that if we push forward and lose a goal, we need to believe we can go up the other end and score. We need two goals a game in this league.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wulliepar57
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:10
We have all seen where our problems Lay and one is basics IE: defending the back post ! we seem to give most teams the freedom of KDM to do as they wish
But our Biggest problem is if we give a goal away , it`s hard to see where we are going to get a goal from !
This more than anything is killing us off where a game is tight
We should have got a natural striker in ! it would be better to do without a couple of ordinary players and pay the wages for someone who knows where the back of the net is , but our recruitment strategy is always last gasp so we get to pick who nobody else want`s , although this season there were also underlying problems which we did not know about till late , but it`s still not good enough to expect what we have to score Goals because at present none are good enough
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: KirklistonPar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:18
Our owners have let the fans down money allocation and timings for signing players and the quality of the management they have signed has been very poor. Hopefully our new owners are a bit more savvy.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:33
Quote:
Berkey, Sat 2 Nov 18:14
If we look like a mid table team then why are we not mid table?
Lots could change with ownership and management but if we go with what we have now then it looks like weâll be fighting it out to avoid the relegation playoffs.
Thank god for airdrie eh.
Because we have only looked like a mid table team for the last few weeks, following a few additions. I`m sure you could have figured that out.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:38
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
âUsually brilliantâ đđđđđ
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:40
Quote:
Dave_1885, Sat 2 Nov 19:38
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
âUsually brilliantâ đđđđđ
Overreacting from Tuesday until around 4pm today.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:51
I think you can lament losing the goal from the set piece and another goal against us at the back post, but fundamentally, there is always the likelihood that you will lose a goal, particularly against most of the teams in this league. The focus needs to be how we can create more goal scoring opportunities and be more clinical in front of goal.
Despite the loss today, I see improvement and no lack of effort. It`s a case of keep plugging away and being positive. Positivity is a self fulfilling prophecy.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Rigger Al
Date: Sat 2 Nov 19:53
I wouldnt say that about Hammy ,a number of times this season hes been avarage like many others
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:01
We are not going to win the league and we won`t get relegated.a playoff spot should be the objective and is not out of reach in my view. I haven`t seen a team in this league that is a standout. We are no better or worse than anyone else. The difference is simply scoring goals. You have a run of 2 or 3 wins and everything changes.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:03
Quote:
Indiapar, Sat 2 Nov 20:01
We are not going to win the league and we won`t get relegated.a playoff spot should be the objective and is not out of reach in my view. I haven`t seen a team in this league that is a standout. We are no better or worse than anyone else. The difference is simply scoring goals. You have a run of 2 or 3 wins and everything changes.
I`d agree but I don`t think we score enough and unfortunately that will stop us going on the run required to get a play off place. Lower league championship side probably.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:05
Quote:
The Boss, Sat 2 Nov 18:24
No chance will we get mid table with McPake in charge.
Disagree 100%
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:07
It`s the same folk piling on mashing their keyboards with the same pihs every week.
Desperate for a defeat.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:10
Separately hats off to the PT supporters today who certainly won the singing contest
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: evo!
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:19
First half nothing in it, Thistle having that chance just before half time only thing I can remember.
Second half we were better and thought the goal came against the run of play. Poor defending from ngwnega to give away the free kick and Hammy should have buried that chance.
From then on we didn`t do much and subs did nothing of note.
BEAST!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cfad
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:20
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Which was also an overreaction. Too many posters at the extremes on this forum, itâs laughable
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:34
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 20:20
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Which was also an overreaction. Too many posters at the extremes on this forum, itâs laughable
That was my point tbh đ Tuesday felt good especially as it was against the form book but in hindsight watching both games, Livi werenât able to deal with our physicality but Thistle were able to match it.
We should have had the corner, they get a free kick and score from it.
We miss a blatant chance and then didnât make the best of the following opportunities.
The Ngwenya sub was McPakes mistake today
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Alter Ego
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:51
Same old rubbish again todayâŚWe need a new manager with different ideas to come in asap. McPake and his management team are finished now.
Time to start fresh and get the best out of the team now!
Mon the Pars!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buster_Brown
Date: Sat 2 Nov 20:59
Fed up posting the same thing week after week.
What I will say though, we canât score goals..and if we canât score goals then weâll not win games, so how people think weâll finish mid table is mind blowing to me.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: adj27
Date: Sat 2 Nov 21:28
We all know we canât score goals but it was very telling today that (with McCann already off) and Kane injured, our management team chose to replace him with another midfield player when we had 2 forwards on the bench
Andy
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sat 2 Nov 21:34
Quote:
Buster_Brown, Sat 2 Nov 20:59
Fed up posting the same thing week after week.
What I will say though, we canât score goals..and if we canât score goals then weâll not win games, so how people think weâll finish mid table is mind blowing to me.
You obviously missed them all saying we were going to finish top 4 then⌠mid table is best case scenario for us atm
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Alter Ego
Date: Sat 2 Nov 21:36
We have the young Sutherland on the bench that can score goals and young/hungry but yet again doesnât get onâŚ.. we have nothing to lose playing the old ***** that donât careâŚđ¤ˇ
Mon the Pars!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Paralex
Date: Sat 2 Nov 21:45
I thought Ngwenye was our best player in the first half and most of the second, apart from maybe the covering at their goal. I was very disappointed with Dapo Mebude. Having seen decent flashes of skill in his recent substitute appearances, I was expecting a lot more from him, but he was largely ineffectual throughout. You couldn`t fault the team for effort but the skill and at times, the pace of our front men wasn`t good enough to threaten Thistle`s goal. Poor Chris Hamilton will be having nightmares about the miss. I don`t remember him scoring for Dunfermline, so maybe it fell to the wrong man ( but with so few getting on the score sheet, it might be difficult to identify who the right man may be). Very disappointing day, especially sitting with my PT supporting pal in the Norrie. We sure did play into their hands by gifting them the first goal. They seem to know how to defend a one goal lead. The same pattern of spoiling the game comes into play when we succumb to a one goal deficit.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Alter Ego
Date: Sat 2 Nov 21:54
Hamilton missed a great chanceâŚ.
Mon the Pars!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Kdy Par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 22:17
Quote:
Alter Ego, Sat 2 Nov 21:36
We have the young Sutherland on the bench that can score goals and young/hungry but yet again doesnât get onâŚ.. we have nothing to lose playing the old ***** that donât careâŚđ¤ˇ
Sutherland came on, but was played right wing as opposed to as a striker.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: JTH123
Date: Sat 2 Nov 22:22
I was quite positive at HT. Thought we had played the game in their half and a goal was coming although we hadn`t worked their keeper enough. I just had the feeling we were a team more on the front foot and with a bit more urgency than of late. I wasn`t there Tuesday.
But after Kane went off we were always going to struggle. Yes Hammy could have scored but it came to him quickly and at a height that looked hard to keep down. KRH had a couple of decent balls in but it is so frustrating to see some of them blocked by the first man when we look to be in a good position because decent service into the strikers is in such short supply. I firmly believe that Kane looks like the only 1 likely to score from open play cause he can create and score. Anyway as soon as they scored, that was it and we looked less and less likely to equalise the longer it went on. First time I`ve seen Mebude and he looks a handful without really threatening their goal. I just hope his tendancy to hold on to the ball too long isn`t a regular feature of his play cause on at least 1 occasion we could have scored if he`d released it.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: kelty_par
Date: Sat 2 Nov 22:36
"Because we have only looked like a mid table team for the last few weeks, following a few additions. I`m sure you could have figured that out."
1 win and 2 draws from 6 league games is nowhere near mid table form.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: The Boss
Date: Sat 2 Nov 23:00
Quote:
da_no_1, Sat 02 Nov 20:05
Quote:
The Boss, Sat 2 Nov 18:24
No chance will we get mid table with McPake in charge.
Disagree 100%
Disagree 100% if you like but 2 wins from 12 isnât mid table form. Weâre sleep walking into relegation with McPake in charge. Heâs up there with Grant and Hughes. Absolutely awful.
I like black and white (dreaming of black and white)
You like black and white
Run run away
Post Edited (Sat 02 Nov 23:01)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cfad
Date: Sat 2 Nov 23:35
Up there with Grant - you need you head examined son đ
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: GG Riva
Date: Sun 3 Nov 06:56
Quote:
JTH123, Sat 2 Nov 22:22
I was quite positive at HT. Thought we had played the game in their half and a goal was coming although we hadn`t worked their keeper enough. I just had the feeling we were a team more on the front foot and with a bit more urgency than of late. I wasn`t there Tuesday.
But after Kane went off we were always going to struggle. Yes Hammy could have scored but it came to him quickly and at a height that looked hard to keep down. KRH had a couple of decent balls in but it is so frustrating to see some of them blocked by the first man when we look to be in a good position because decent service into the strikers is in such short supply. I firmly believe that Kane looks like the only 1 likely to score from open play cause he can create and score. Anyway as soon as they scored, that was it and we looked less and less likely to equalise the longer it went on. First time I`ve seen Mebude and he looks a handful without really threatening their goal. I just hope his tendancy to hold on to the ball too long isn`t a regular feature of his play cause on at least 1 occasion we could have scored if he`d released it.
Best post on this thread, JTH. I very rarely post straight after a defeat because emotions are high and negativity is rife. To suggest we were "dung" is nonsense. We didn`t do nearly enough to say we should have won the game but a draw would have been a fair result. It became increasingly obvious as the game went on that one goal was likely to win it - unfortunately, Partick got it. Even so, Hammy will be gutted he snatched at that chance. When Kane had to come off, we lost any goalscoring threat. My mate, who`s played the game to a decent level, predicted that Todd would come on for Kane and Dapo would move into the middle.
The thread I started after the Livi game was very tongue-in-cheek, precisely because many fans get far too carried away after a win and far too down after a defeat. I don`t think there`s that much between all the teams in this league, with the possible exception of Airdrie, who are making a habit of losing. We`re not scoring nearly enough but at least we`re not shipping goals like Airdrie and Morton did yesterday. If we can sort that out, we`ll climb up the table. Tuesday was a false dawn, perhaps helped by Livi`s insistence on playing out from the back.i`m hopeful that the upcoming fixtures will yield some much needed points. Scoring the first goal in these games would be a great tactic. đ
Not your average Sunday League player.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sun 3 Nov 08:20
We are a better side than we were at the start of the season so that`s encouraging. The only difference between the sides yesterday was the fact that they scored. I thought on too many occasions going wide we didn`t benefit from it. We either lost the ball in key positions or it went out for a goal kick or throw in to the opposition. You lose impetus, and the advantage. It`s a bit too predicable. We need to come inside and drive towards goal a bit more. Knock the ball to feet inside the box and increase the tempo and movement in the final third. Dapo had long spells out of the game but I thought he did better in the central role when Kane went off with his movement and touch on the ball. David Wotherspoon was excellent I thought with some of his passes and crosses into the box.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sun 3 Nov 08:56
We really needed an aerial threat yesterday as the game wore on.
Itâs going to have to be an excellent cross in to pick out a pars player against the likes of Ashcroft. Esepchailly if not near the byline when it comes in.
Wotherspoon was really good and tried to grab the game by the scruff of the neck but there was only so much he can do and lacked anything around him.
There was a comment on here a week or so ago about how dapo could be so good once fit his teammates might not be able to keep up with him, it looks like they wonât have to as he doesnât bother looking up for a pass anyway! At this point his contribution is largely that heâll either win you a corner or just give the ball away. Needs to up his game a level as itâs all on him if the creativity and threat on the other side is McCann.
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Indiapar
Date: Sun 3 Nov 09:26
I think, given our lack of aerial supremacy, we need to be looking to pick the second ball up more around the D area outside the box.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: JTH123
Date: Sun 3 Nov 09:29
Yesterday was the best I`ve seen Wotherspoon but unfortunately a lot of his good work was quite far from goal.
Agree about the cross balls Berkey and I`ve said over the last few weeks that we don`t put enough early balls into the box when it`s less congested. But the really alarming thing for me is that they seem to be our only hope from open play as its hard to see a chance being created through the middle unless Kane goes all Rambo and tries to drive through himself.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Higgys Mohawk
Date: Sun 3 Nov 09:49
I thought yesterday was a well contested match and there isnât much between the teams. Thistle had two chances, one in the first when we nicked the ball off Robinson and one in the second, which they scored from.
Poor from Ngwenya selling himself and then diving in, and then we donât defend the free kick.
Hamilton should have scored and you could see how gutted he was with the miss.
I can see improvements in how weâre playing - itâs nowhere near as bad as it was early in the season. The effort is there but without Kane we donât seem to have a goal threat. We were putting crosses into the box but no one there. I know todorov hasnât really done it since he left, but having someone like him on the bench when we reach that point of swinging the balls in could have been the difference.
Thought Wotherspoon and Benedictus were our best players.
Young struggled at times so be interesting to see if he keeps his place next week with Fogarty on the bench.
I think if we play with the levels of effort we did yesterday weâll start picking up more points. A draw would have been fair.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 3 Nov 09:57
Agree re Todorov. When we released him after winning league 1 I expected an upgrade. We got OâHalloran probably on big money 2 year deal. That`s on McPake.
We currently have 3 massive players in our squad. Tobi Otoo and Kane. It seems to me that if one of them is missing we revert back to our very worst type.
Hopefully Kane is OK for next week. Same team bar Otoo for Hamilton and we`ll be in with a chance. We are improving but admittedly from a very low bar.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buster_Brown
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:10
Quote:
da_no_1, Sun 3 Nov 09:57
Hopefully Kane is OK for next week. Same team bar Otoo for Hamilton and we`ll be in with a chance. We are improving but admittedly from a very low bar.
He was concussed, so Iâd imagine there is no reason why he wouldnât be
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:25
Quote:
PARrot, Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
You were one of themâŚ
I see youâre now back tracking after thinking about it
What was it you said?
Oh aye âI expect top 4â đ¤ˇđťââď¸đđ
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:30
Thatâs great news is itâs not an injury as such for Kane.
Da no 1 your team is almost there, otoo in for Hamilton, fogarty in for young and KRH in for McCann and it feels like our best team.
Is oâhallaran injured or has he just been frozen out?
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: wee eck
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:33
I was really disappointed by yesterday`s display. After Tuesday I was hoping we would kick on and gain some momentum but, although it was a pretty even game, we failed to impose ourselves and lost a soft goal. This has happened too many times this season.
The thing that impressed me most about Falkirk last weekend was their ability to play precise football in the final third. Most teams resort to hit-and-hope balls into the box or aimless shots from distance but they were always trying to play passes into the area to team-mates who were constantly on the move creating space and harassing defenders. That is something we sadly lack.
I think Young may be rested next week. His distribution yesterday was very erratic and often resulted in us losing any momentum we had created. Plus signs are the increasing influence of senior players like Kane, Wotherspoon and Bene who were all written off for various reasons earlier in the season.
Replacing 6 outfield players during a game where you need to establish some rhythm and momentum is just crazy and smacks of desperation. I`d like to see the number of subs limited to, say, 3.
The manager seemed more upset about the goal we conceded than the gilt-edged chance we missed which maybe says something about his mindset. That must be the most clear-cut opportunity we have created all season and, striker or not, Hammy should have put it away. Equalising so soon after they scored could have turned the game in our favour.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:38
Quote:
Berkey, Sun 3 Nov 12:30
Thatâs great news is itâs not an injury as such for Kane.
Da no 1 your team is almost there, otoo in for Hamilton, fogarty in for young and KRH in for McCann and it feels like our best team.
Is oâhallaran injured or has he just been frozen out?
Fogarty might be in for Bene. He took 2 sore ones yesterday. KRH didn`t offer much yesterday IMHO. Gets into great positions, 1 from an excellent through ball by Wotherspoon, but more often than not he just doesn`t pick the right final ball.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Buster_Brown
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:50
Quote:
da_no_1, Sun 3 Nov 12:38
KRH didn`t offer much yesterday IMHO. Gets into great positions, 1 from an excellent through ball by Wotherspoon, but more often than not he just doesn`t pick the right final ball.
Totally disagree with that. The amount of times he had space, was screaming for the ball because he was free, and we went down the left was unbelievable.
I agree he has generally been disappointing so far this season, but yesterday he offered a lot but never actually got the ball
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sun 3 Nov 12:52
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 12:25
Quote:
PARrot, Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
You were one of themâŚ
I see youâre now back tracking after thinking about it
What was it you said?
Oh aye âI expect top 4â đ¤ˇđťââď¸đđ
And I followed that up shortly after, which you know fine well.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 3 Nov 13:00
Quote:
Buster_Brown, Sun 3 Nov 12:50
Quote:
da_no_1, Sun 3 Nov 12:38
KRH didn`t offer much yesterday IMHO. Gets into great positions, 1 from an excellent through ball by Wotherspoon, but more often than not he just doesn`t pick the right final ball.
Totally disagree with that. The amount of times he had space, was screaming for the ball because he was free, and we went down the left was unbelievable.
I agree he has generally been disappointing so far this season, but yesterday he offered a lot but never actually got the ball
NGenwa had a fair bit of joy down the left
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sun 3 Nov 13:01
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 12:52
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 12:25
Quote:
PARrot, Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
You were one of themâŚ
I see youâre now back tracking after thinking about it
What was it you said?
Oh aye âI expect top 4â đ¤ˇđťââď¸đđ
And I followed that up shortly after, which you know fine well.
I know fine well what?
You were giving it the big one, no me. What was it you were sayingâŚ
I expect top 4
You suit yourself
Something else
Something else
And that was in reply to me saying we shouldnât get ahead of ourselves after one good result.
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sun 3 Nov 17:20
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 13:01
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 12:52
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 12:25
Quote:
PARrot, Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
You were one of themâŚ
I see youâre now back tracking after thinking about it
What was it you said?
Oh aye âI expect top 4â đ¤ˇđťââď¸đđ
And I followed that up shortly after, which you know fine well.
I know fine well what?
You were giving it the big one, no me. What was it you were sayingâŚ
I expect top 4
You suit yourself
Something else
Something else
And that was in reply to me saying we shouldnât get ahead of ourselves after one good result.
If you can`t follow a thread maybe just give it a rest.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: McCaig`s Tower
Date: Sun 3 Nov 17:43
That was very similar to a lot of games this season â not a great deal between the sides, but the Pars being edged out due to a combination of mistakes and bluntness in attack.
Thistle will have done their homework and didnât allow us to close the down so much and nullified our limited threats.
Another series of errors for their goal â Ngwenya is done for pace (to be fair the lad is fast), dives in and doesnât win the ball. Iâm not sure if the fake delivery was a ploy, or whether we were caught out but we didnât defend the first ball and were undone at the other post (again).
I donât actually remember getting a shot on target â a couple of blocks perhaps, but Hamiltonâs miss is pretty bad.
The substitutions were a bit odd (not least because there were 6 of them).
KRH for McCann at H/T was unusually early â not sure if McCann had a knock, or whether it was thought KRH could get after the left back but the lack of height thereafter was an issue. KRH had a mixed game â wilfully ignored a lot of the time, beat his man well a couple of times but not great delivery.
Kane was more concerning. Presumably it was under the concussion rule, but I think it was a couple of minutes after the head-knock. Did symptoms not manifest themselves immediately, or was it precautionary? It was notable that it was Todd, not Wighton that replaced him, with Dapo moving to the middle.
The others were a bit of a mish-mash and I didnât discern a clear plan. If Otoo was to provide drive from midfield, why did he then move to left back? Was it because of Ngwenyaâs yellow card? It all seemed a bit random â throw some people on, give the ball to Wotherspoon and hope something happens.
Spoony has come onto something resembling a game now. Whether the greater squad depth means he has had to pull up his socks, or it`s taken longer to get the hang of new team mates and a new style, I don`t know. Either explanation would be a function of our refusal to "do our business early". I imagine there could be financial reasons for this but whether this has been quantified in terms of points would be something I`d like to know.
According to a stat I saw we have had more shots this season than Thistle, and more shots on target, but have scored fewer than half the goals. I think the last stat is significant. We do look pretty average without Kane and need a way to work round his absence
Post Edited (Sun 03 Nov 17:43)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sun 3 Nov 18:46
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 17:20
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 13:01
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 12:52
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 12:25
Quote:
PARrot, Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
You were one of themâŚ
I see youâre now back tracking after thinking about it
What was it you said?
Oh aye âI expect top 4â đ¤ˇđťââď¸đđ
And I followed that up shortly after, which you know fine well.
I know fine well what?
You were giving it the big one, no me. What was it you were sayingâŚ
I expect top 4
You suit yourself
Something else
Something else
And that was in reply to me saying we shouldnât get ahead of ourselves after one good result.
If you can`t follow a thread maybe just give it a rest.
So what were you meaning when you wrote âI expect top 4â?
COYP
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sun 3 Nov 18:51
âKRH didn`t offer much yesterday IMHO. Gets into great positions, 1 from an excellent through ball by Wotherspoon, but more often than not he just doesn`t pick the right final ball.â
Da no 1 itâs a shame you cast such a critical eye over KRH but wonât hear a bad word against McCann who is worse in his decision making. KRH offered so much more than McCann did on sat before he was quite rightly hooked.
I got those saying we need McCann in for his height but have you seen him in air? He doesnât actually win many headers at all, struggles to time his jumps and is regularly caught under the ball.
Post Edited (Sun 03 Nov 18:55)
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sun 3 Nov 18:57
Quote:
Berkey, Sun 3 Nov 18:51
KRH didn`t offer much yesterday IMHO. Gets into great positions, 1 from an excellent through ball by Wotherspoon, but more often than not he just doesn`t pick the right final ball.
Da no 1 itâs a shame you cast such a critical eye over KRH but wonât hear a bad word against McCann who is worse in his decision making. KRH offered so much more than McCann did on sat before he was quite rightly hooked.
I got those saying we need McCann in for his height but have you seen him in air? He doesnâty actually win many headers at all, struggles to time his jumps and is regularly caught under the ball.
I`m sorry Berkey but to say that McCann doesn`t win many headers is complete nonsense. He is actually not bad on the air usually flicking on lost causes because we can`t seem to run behind our striker.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Berkey
Date: Sun 3 Nov 19:19
If he was half decent in the air heâd have more goals and assists. For someone of his height he doesnât win as much as you would expect.
Iâm not saying he doesnât win anything and now heâs been put out on the wing heâs up against smaller full backs but itâs so rare he wins a header and it actually goes to a pars player.
You might find a better tactic is to play KRH and either keep in on the deck or look for balls over the top.
The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 3 Nov 19:30
I`m awfy sorry. I`ll send my posts to you for sense checking/proof reading before I submit them from now on.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: cammypar 1995
Date: Sun 3 Nov 19:32
Quote:
Berkey, Sun 3 Nov 19:19
If he was half decent in the air heâd have more goals and assists. For someone of his height he doesnât win as much as you would expect.
Iâm not saying he doesnât win anything and now heâs been put out on the wing heâs up against smaller full backs but itâs so rare he wins a header and it actually goes to a pars player.
You might find a better tactic is to play KRH and either keep in on the deck or look for balls over the top.
But that`s not what you said earlier. You said he doesn`t win many headers at all and now you`ve changed it to he doesn`t win much that goes to a pars player. That`s why I said your original post was nonsense.
c'mon the pars
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Alter Ego
Date: Sun 3 Nov 20:07
Another brutal performance so when will this end? The Germans keeping the management untill they sell and we could be relegated? The whole club is a shambles from top right down to the pars tv bottomđ
(only joking as I donât want a red)
I did say this could happen when the German mob took over and tried the academy way and the be nice in football or whatever they spoutâŚ
Mon the Pars!
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: da_no_1
Date: Sun 3 Nov 21:16
Brutal? Not the game I saw.
"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: Dave_1885
Date: Sun 3 Nov 21:32
Quote:
da_no_1, Sun 3 Nov 21:16
Brutal? Not the game I saw.
It wasnât exactly the best advert for the championship - by that I mean both teams performances and the standard of officiating. Frustrating not taking advantage of that though to earn at least a point.
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sun 3 Nov 22:18
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 18:46
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 17:20
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 13:01
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 12:52
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sun 3 Nov 12:25
Quote:
PARrot, Sat 2 Nov 23:40
Quote:
NMCmassive, Sat 2 Nov 20:15
Quote:
cfad, Sat 2 Nov 18:54
Nothing whatsoever between the two teams today, in fact we were pushing on more than they were. Two moments turned the game, poor defending to allow them a free header and then a shocker of a miss from the usually brilliant Hammy. We were more than competitive so letâs not overreact.
You mean we shouldnât overreact like we did after the kick result saying we should expect a top 4 finish?
Except that isn`t what actually happened
You were one of themâŚ
I see youâre now back tracking after thinking about it
What was it you said?
Oh aye âI expect top 4â đ¤ˇđťââď¸đđ
And I followed that up shortly after, which you know fine well.
I know fine well what?
You were giving it the big one, no me. What was it you were sayingâŚ
I expect top 4
You suit yourself
Something else
Something else
And that was in reply to me saying we shouldnât get ahead of ourselves after one good result.
If you can`t follow a thread maybe just give it a rest.
So what were you meaning when you wrote âI expect top 4â?
Try following the thread
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: PARrot
Date: Sun 3 Nov 22:20
Quote:
Alter Ego, Sun 3 Nov 20:07
Another brutal performance so when will this end? The Germans keeping the management untill they sell and we could be relegated? The whole club is a shambles from top right down to the pars tv bottomđ
(only joking as I donât want a red)
I did say this could happen when the German mob took over and tried the academy way and the be nice in football or whatever they spoutâŚ
Now where have I heard all this before?
|
|
|
|
Topic Originator: NMCmassive
Date: Sun 3 Nov 22:50
Quote:
PARrot, Sun 3 Nov 22:20
Quote:
Alter Ego, Sun 3 Nov 20:07
Another brutal performance so when will this end? The Germans keeping the management untill they sell and we could be relegated? The whole club is a shambles from top right down to the pars tv bottomđ
(only joking as I donât want a red)
I did say this could happen when the German mob took over and tried the academy way and the be nice in football or whatever they spoutâŚ
Now where have I heard all this before?
Well at least heâs standing by what he saysâŚ
COYP
|
|
|
|
|